Torkild Carstens
Apt 14 Rocamare C, 71 rue G Clemenceau, 06400
Cannes, France
Tel: 334 93 99 50 98, fax 334 92 98 66 32
E-mail tcarstens@wtc-sophia.com
Abstract: The decision process leading from
awareness to action is discussed and used as a backdrop for the special problem
of managing water resources without waiting for the demand to increase the
supply and thus have a crisis-driven management. Today even this sensible goal
requires much more media attention than before to get on the agenda. The problem
will be considerably reduced if water could be seen as other commodities and
traded in water markets. Trading and transfer modes are summarily described, and
in the context of securing water supply the concept of virtual water is briefly
reviewed. The main problem is under all circumstances the hydropolitical one of obtaining approval
for projects that become more and more complex. The solution is to establish
broad and well-informed support teams for the decision-makers. These teams must
be able to identify and communicate with all stakeholders, and the author shares
the view that their contribution to society is maximised if they pay close
attention to undesired consequences. To this end hydroinformatics is our most powerful tool.
Keywords:
freshwater shortage,
decision process, water use, water market, water transport
Understandably,
the management of freshwater to meet growing demands has been a top priority
challenge throughout history, as witnessed by Persian tunnels, Egyptian canals
and Roman aquaducts. The best engineers at the time were involved in these
impressive civic works, many of which have lasted until this day. The creation
of infrastructure was for a long time associated with peace-time military
engineering, but developed into civilian government branches of travaux publiques that have performed
admirably in many countries, and still do. The fountains of Rome and the gardens
in Versailles testify both to the sophistication of earlier epochs and to the
skills of the contemporary hydraulic engineers. They also reveal the
shortcomings, which were mainly a lack of knowledge of medical hygiene. While
water was delivered in quantities which exceeded present day per capita
consumption many times, the water quality was often inferior and sometimes
unsafe, due to intruding
wastewater. Epidemics of diseases
like cholera took the population in London and many other cities by surprise
before it was recognised that they are water-borne. (Among the many theories for
the decline of The Roman Empire one is the possibility that because the water
pipes made of lead, Rome's population was suffering from lead poisoning).
The inherited top-down water
management still prevails and delivers, in most cities, water of acceptable
quality in the quantities demanded to their supply grids, proving that the
engineers in charge of water supply to cities of just about any size are still
competent, although the glamour of their profession is lost. However, all is not
well, as we are reminded of every 22 March, the World Water Day, and frequently
through news items such as today's random example (Le Monde, 12 Oct 00: The city
of Toulouse has only 24 hours of reserve in case of a serious pollution of the
principal river supplying that city). The sad fact is that more than a billion
people, made up of the marginalised population in the urban slums, and overpopulated rural
areas, do not have access to a safe municipal grid for drinking water. The
squatters in their shacks surrounding most mega-cities do not show up on any
plans and are virtually neglected by all authorities, including the water ones.
And rural water supply is in a sad
state in many countries.
So far the supply of freshwater has
been sufficient to meet the growing needs. Concern over the fraction of
freshwater that can be harnessed in the hydrologic cycle, is a recent topic, and
a a very disturbing one. As late as
in 1976 none of Kahn's many scenarios in "The
next 200 years" mentions water shortage as a possibility, although he
is worried about the effect of water pollution on the environment. Freshwater
was for all practical purposes unlimited, or so we thought until a few years
ago. The disturbing news that it is not, became widely known through the
inventory by Postel et al (1996). They demonstrated that the present world
population of six billion is already using more than half of the useable
fraction of the total annual runoff, which is 40 000 km3. From the
gross total they deducted flood runoff and runoff in thinly inhabited regions
such as the Arctic and the Amazonas, which are also too remote for transfer, to
arrive at the available global
freshwater resource. Their deductions reduced the reserve from comfortable 4.9
to a mere 0.8 times the present consumption of 6 780 km3/yr.
Evidently, since a linear extrapolation of the demand based on today's per
capita consumption meets the available freshwater runoff within 25 - 30 years,
something has to be done with the demand as well as the supply before the world
runs out of naturally recycled freshwater.
Table
1 Annual freshwater runoff (after Postel et al., 1996)
|
|
Volume km3 |
Percent |
|
Runoff |
40 000 |
100 |
|
Flood losses |
20 400 |
51 |
|
Geographically remote |
7 100 |
18 |
|
Accessible |
12 500 |
31 |
|
In use |
6 780 |
17 |
|
Reserve |
5 720 |
14 |
It didn’t take
long for this result to sink in and change our priorities. On their list of
problems facing us in the next 25 years, a UN panel of futurologists in 1998
ranked freshwater second, after population control. With the new insight
provided by a simple, but long overdue inventory, freshwater shortage is now
considered a greater threat than nuclear war, epidemics, food or energy
shortage, and climate change.
The gross figures in Table 1 are
supplemented by the joint distribution of runoff and population in Table 2, but
in order to map the risk areas, it is necessary to get down to the regional and
local levels.
Table
2 Joint distribution of runoff and population (after Postel et
al., 1996)
|
Continent |
Runoff % |
Population % |
|
Europe |
8.0 |
13 |
|
Asia |
35.8 |
60.5 |
|
Africa |
10.6 |
12.5 |
|
North and Central America |
15.2 |
8.0 |
|
South America |
25.6 |
5.5 |
|
Australia and Oceania |
4.8 |
0.5 |
An interesting
alternative to the prevailing philosophy of maximum happiness has been proposed
by sociologists and political scientists concerned with the planning of
community development, which is a highly unpredictable process towards noble,
but misty ideological goals (Brox 1995). Since consensus on ideological goals is
all but ruled out, the reverse concept of antigoals is introduced: Even if we disagree on where to go from
here, it should be feasible to agree on where we don't want to end up. Instead
of maximum happiness we should perhaps strive to achieve minimum unhappiness.
The metaphor is
the state ship with a captain who doesn't know which port he is to call. Forced
to sail without a destination, the captain must avoid immediate disaster by
steering away from shoals and rocks and shorelines. Avoiding these antigoals is
a strategy with which everybody on board agrees, and the voyage can continue
forever if the ship doesn't hit any antigoal.
The classical
problems of our profession are nothing but antigoals and need only to be
redefined as such: Lack of freshwater, loss of freshwater quality, loss of
biotopes and biodiversity, no more environmental and human catastrophes like the
Aral Sea, no more tragic resettlements
like Sardar Sarovar, etc etc.
Why is it then
that these consensus antigoals are often so hard to obtain support for? An
intriguing answer is suggested by Seip and Wenstøp (2000) in a recent study of
decision-making. They have tested some of the most important water management
decisions in Norway recently according to two criteria: The legitimacy of the
decision-makers, and the emotional content
of the decision. While the first criterion is obvious and in line with all
present trends towards more transparency and democracy, the second criterion is
somewhat suspect: What have emotions to do in a rational process? Shouldn't they
be banned?
The answer
appears to be that its emotional content is essential for a so-called rational
decision. Without stirring the right emotions, any issue, no matter how
important, may go wrong. Accordingly, a wise decision, securing support and
spawning action, has a positive emotional content. Convincing evidence has come
from neurologists that have acquired new knowledge about our neural network and
our brains. Their findings undermine Decartes' long-lived concept of our pure
spirit which is capable of reason as long as it is uncontaminated by the
emotions that rule our bodies. An excellent reference is the book "Decartes' Error" by Damasio
(1994).
It is not
sufficient to define societal antigoals that are easy to agree on, because they
define advance with a minimum of risk towards the uncertain future. The
difficult part is to get the antigoal on the political agenda before it develops
into a dramatic crisis, and here we are in the hands of the practitioners of two
metiers: journalism and public relations.
The recipe of
the journalists is given by Aubenas and Benasayag (1999) in “La Fabrication de l'Information”. The book's subtitle is Les journalistes et l'ideologie de la
communication, and it reveals how the mechanics of this ideology creates the
news we are served. “The work of the journalist”, the authors state, “does
not often any more consist of reporting the realities of the world, but to
select among them what should be presented... Everybody knows today that the
newspapers reflect less the reality than the representation they have created”.
And what they select, follows from their code and its hierarchy of criteria. The
normal media focus on the nearby (the law of proximity) is only overruled by the
spectacular, the dramatic, the extraordinary. An obsession with transparency,
easily understood from the point of view of investigative journalism, is not
always effective: "If it doesn’t tolerate grey zones, the press is
condemned to support less and less the realities".
These
constraints on access to the media are quite severe. If a problem is distant in
space or time, or complicated, it is not interesting. The preferred agenda is local, simple and dramatic.
Alas, the
journalists do not run the media alone. They must comply with economic
imperatives and accept on one hand paid advertisements, and on the other hand
ready made stories and news items that do not require further expensive
processing to satisfy the rules. The task of the public relations expert is to
translate his client's thoughts into the language of the journalist, making them
fit for presentation in the media.
A classical
challenge is the pedagogical one of presenting the matter in a way that engages
the audience. Here the Sesame Street educational
TV series has had a lasting effect, successfully competing with commercial TV
entertainment and pioneering edu-tainment,
the modern, or perhaps post-modern, version of learning through play. There
is a close resemblance between the journalistic prerequisite of drama and the
educational use of puppets to convey a message. In general, however, the
pedagogical tricks are well known and accepted, while those of the media are
less well known. Three educational examples may illustrate the points made
above.
The convention
on the non-navigable uses of international watercourses
This convention
was adopted by the UN in 1997, after a gestation period of more than twenty
years. To become law it must be ratified by 35 nations, however, as of today
only 12 nations have done so, and it is an open question whether it will ever
achieve the status of a binding law. The legitimacy of the decision-makers is
unquestionable, but the emotional content of the decision is bewildering.
The treaty on
banning of land mines
By contrast,
this treaty, adopted in 1995, was ratified by a record 110 countries after two
years. Clearly its uncontroversial emotional content, dramatically as well as
gracefully exposed by Lady Diana, unified the world and secured the law. An
interesting detail is the fact that although none of the large producers of
mines (China, India, Iraq, Russia and the US)
has ratified, they were powerless in resisting the law.
The world water
vision
When an entire
profession, such as the water engineers and scientists, makes an effort to
impose freshwater on the world agenda in order to forestall a wide-spread water
crisis, this is something unheard of previously. With a massive input generated
by some 15 000 enthusiastic water experts world-wide, the Vision's message that
was presented in the Hague in March 2000, is far from satisfying the basic
journalistic rules referred to above. It is global instead of local and complex
instead of simple, but it does contain extremely dramatic elements. To make the
Vision palatable for the media, an enormous PR campaign was staged. Judged by
the criteria of the PR profession, which is counting the number of articles, TV
showings, interviews etc, the campaign was a great success. However, its real
impact is not measurable, and one can only hope that the vast information
diffused world-wide by the 1 000 journalists and media technicians present, was
not wasted. The Forum itself attracted more than 5 000 water experts, but only
about 100 politicians attended, almost all ministers of water resources. Thus
the meeting was essentially a gathering of the water community. Clearly, much
work needs to be done before the next World Water Forum if the freshwater
problem is to be taken seriously by everybody and not just by the experts.
If we want to
avoid a crisis, it is necessary, but not sufficient, to do our hydrotechnical
homework. No matter how good our plans are, they don't convince the
decision-makers unless they strike the right sentiments in the community. The
world is full of noble causes competing for attention and funding, so a skilful
marketing is required as well. The sad reality is that the quality of the
presentation is sometimes more important than the technical quality of the
project. The easy way out for us hydrotechnicians is to wait for the crossover
point in time when the demand exceeds the supply, and the process becomes
crisis-driven. But a less cynical and more civilised approach is to work for a
pro-active solution, informing, educating and influencing stakeholders as well
as decision makers. In short, we must get involved in hydropolitics and
hydrodiplomacy. The decision tools we possess, or are developing right now to
promote better hydropolitics, belong to the new and exploding field of hydroinformatics. It employs communication and information
technology (CIT) to improve the quality of hydrotechnical solutions, but it also
addresses the equally important process of project acceptance and approval,
which is what hydropolitics is all about. The classical decision support
developed from industrial operations research and often referred to as water
management science (see Revelle (1999) for a good example), is popular among
water authorities and technocrats as it provides a multi-objective optimisation
technique based on decision mathematics. The emerging hydroinformatics, on the
other hand, uses CIT to encourage stakeholder participation, which may introduce
ideas that challenge the authorities. With hydroinformaticians within their
ranks, the water engineers have taken a decisive step to include hydropolitics
on their agenda, albeit in an advisory role as facilitators for both top-down
and bottom-up processes.
CIT makes
non-governmental initiatives feasible, whether by professional, commercial or
grassroots organisations. It is an equaliser, making water management more
democratic, but also more complex and challenging. Naudascher (1996) argued for
full compensation to the losers when new reservoirs cause involuntary
resettlement, and a voice for all stakeholders in the decision process. Using
the same tragic evidence as Naudascher, Abbott (2000) goes a step further,
arguing that the water professionals associated with projects which seriously
degrade the lives of the losers, are accomplices of what he considers crimes
against humanity. He sees the democratisation of the decision making process as
the next big challenge for the hydroinformaticians, a task that may also restore
the public image of our profession.
Local buy and
sell water markets have always existed in many places where there is seasonal
water shortage. Predictably, such local water markets will increase in number
and size as a result either of increased demand or of decreased supply, and they
will include long term opportunities.
For seashore
sites the market price is limited by the cost of locally desalinated sea water,
which depends heavily on the local energy price. This upper bound defines the
water market, which Shuval (2000) has named the economic watershed: That geographical
area surrounding a water short area where the cost of imported water is equal to
or less than the cost of locally desalinated sea water and/or recycled treated
waste water. Together with the concept virtual
water coined by Allan (1997) for the water required to produce food and
other commodities (Table 3), the boundary conditions for a freshwater market are
set.
Table 3
Virtual water. typical water requirement for production of foods in
california, (FAO,1989)
|
Food (kilogram) |
Water (liters) |
Food (kilogram) |
Water (liters) |
|
Wheat |
1,273 |
Beef |
16,193 |
|
Rice |
2,005 |
Pork |
5,760 |
|
Maize |
978 |
Poultry |
5,730 |
|
Potatoes |
147 |
Eggs |
3,740 |
|
Sugar |
2,731 |
Milk |
971 |
|
soybean oil |
21,692 |
Butter |
22,274 |
This market is facing many constraints, ranging from the religious claim
for water as a gift of God and the philosophical claim of the right to water as
part of human rights, to the simpler arguments that dependence on water import
weakens the national self-sufficiency and the national security.
The term water
trading is used both for the water market transactions described above and for
barter in which only water quantities and not money are included. Barter may
involve more than two countries, often all countries in shared water basins, and
sometimes countries in adjacent basins. Before one can start trading, an agreed
allocation scheme must exist. Barter can then improve the value of the allocated
water by taking advantage of existing hydrotechnical structures such as storage
dams, diversion canals and tunnels, or even the construction of new facilities.
An intriguing
example of this kind of water trading, which he has given the name ‘wheeling’, is offered by Wolf (1996).
He considers a technically simple diversion of water from Syrian and Turkish
rivers to Northern Israel, in exchange of increased Syrian and/or Jordanian
abstractions from the Yarmuk before it enters Israel from the East. Some of the
diverted water coming down the Jordan River may be earmarked for Palestine’s
West Bank, and allow West Bank groundwater to be diverted to Gaza.
As Wolf
observes, water can be transported in a water grid much as electric energy is
transported in an electric grid. The system can be designed to allow inputs and
withdrawals at numerous nodes and can be operated with payment in cash or in
kind, i.e. barter. The hard part is neither the hardware nor the software of the
water conveyance system, but the hydropolitical decision process.
Canals
The Roman
aquaducts demonstrate interbasin water transfer as they gracefully span valleys.
The energy source to power the transfer was gravity, but water was also lifted
up to the aquaducts by pumping. Modern canals frequently cross valleys through
tunnels underneath rather than on bridges above the valley floor, making them
less visible, but more efficient.
Pipelines
Pipelines are
the common carrier of imported water to urban areas. The pipeline can be built
through almost any kind of terrain, either on the ground or buried, and the
water is better protected against pollution (and pilferage) than in a canal.
Submerged pipelines are feasible and sometimes the cheapest solution.
Politically a pipeline on the international sea bed may be a feasible, although
expensive alternative.
Tankers
Commodity
transport by tankers is common, with oil as the prime example. The chief
advantage of ships is their flexibility, as they can call on any port for
loading and unloading, given a minimum of terminal facilities. While oil is
priced so high that it can afford the heavy tanker transport costs, water
cannot, except for disaster relief.
Barges
Towed or pushed
barges are used for commodity transport in calm waters, mainly, if not
exclusively, on rivers and lakes. Essentially a container, the barge incurs
costs considerably less than those of a tanker.
Bags
A spinoff from
the oil spill combat technology, the plastic bag designed for water transport
resembles the barge in that it is towed, but differs in that it is towed only
one way. For the return trip it is rolled up on the deck of the tug boat, thus
saving fuel and cutting the round trip time.
Icebergs
The idea of
towing large icebergs from the Antarctic was investigated in the sixties and
first found feasible, but later withdrawn. The second thought was a scenario in
which the big iceberg spawned small icebergs during transit, setting the stage
for potential "Titanic"- type disasters.
For hauls up to
100 or 200 km, imports with water bags is cheapest and can compete with locally
desalinated water. The exact distance depends primarily on the energy costs for
the desalination plant and for the tug, respectively.
Since freshwater
is the only indispensable and irreplaceable life supply commodity, its
continuous supply must be secured. A scheduled stop in delivery cannot last many
days before it has serious consequences for human health and welfare, and the
impact of a sudden breakdown may be disastrous. Water contamination, as we have
seen, spreads epidemics fast, so water quality must be continuously monitored
and maintained. (Moreover, the taste of water is important, as the exploding
market for bottled water testifies. The closest thing to water wars at present,
as observed by the media last year, is the cut-throat competition between the
companies producing bottled water).
When increased
upstream abstraction or storage is the cause of water shortage, litigation may
provide a solution, although protection by law of water supply is generally not
secured, in spite of the much talked about human right to water. Unfortunately,
the 1997 UN Convention on the non-navigational uses of international
watercourses is not ratified into law yet, and may in fact never be.
Nevertheless, that convention, as well as the 1966 Helsinki rules, are used as
guidelines for negotiated agreements. Although they are not legally binding, the
de facto power of e.g. the Helsinki
rules has proven to be substantial.
Litigation is in
any case a slow process, so temporary import may be necessary even if a verdict
may secure the long-term supply. The more fruitful approach has been to
negotiate a water sharing agreement directly among the riparians, as has been
achieved even in controversial catchments such as the Indus, the Danube and the
Rhine. Minimum in-stream flow and maximum allowable concentration of pollutants
are typical key items of the eventual agreement, which may also contain the
licensing of reservoirs for flood mitigation and hydropower production. However,
all these rules cannot secure the safe supply of water in basins with periods of
draught, and do not eliminate the need for occasional import during extreme
hydrological events.
Given these
severe constraints, it is understandable that water import is a tricky business.
Ample storage eliminates most of the risk, but there exist ambitious schemes for
continuous import with a minimum of storage. Perhaps the most advanced is the
water bag system developed by Nordic Water Supply ASA (2000). With three bags
one can in principle deliver water continuously: While one bag is being emptied,
the next bag is in transit, and the third one is being refilled. (The return
voyage is made quickly with the bag on deck). This sounds like a vulnerable,
weather-dependent system, but it can readily be made more reliable by adding
storage bags. If storage reservoirs exist at the destination, water import may
not be more complicated than, say, grain import, with its easily visible storage
silos in the harbour area.
Compared with
canals and pipelines which can be closed in case a dispute arises, sea transport
is less vulnerable because the supplier can be changed, if necessary, to
maintain the supply. The analogy to the grain market is obvious and includes the
exporter's and importer’s option to subsidise a wanted trade, for political or
other reasons.
The water we
drink is a mere 1 % , and all our other domestic and industrial needs are only
10 % or so of the water consumed in producing the food we need (Figure 1). While
we are prepared to pay what it costs to deliver domestic and industrial water,
the irrigation farmers in dry climates are unable to pay more than a fraction of
the actual water cost of their products. Yet for many good reasons irrigation
farming is frequently supported with subsidised water in these so-called water- stressed countries (Falkenmark
1989) with less than 1000-2000 m3/p yr. Figure 2 gives an example of
the role of virtual water in a water short area.
When the
economic value of water becomes higher for other uses than for agriculture, it
becomes politically increasingly difficult to maintain traditional agriculture.
The response of the farmers has been to improve the efficiency of their
irrigation system and to switch to crops with lower water demand, both in terms
of quantity and quality. A promising trend is the development of new
salt-tolerant plants. These and other trends in agriculture are motivated by the
competition from the market for virtual water, illustrated in Table 3 above.
What emerges is a plethora of opportunities for the supply of freshwater, resulting in an ever more complex supply web of real as well as virtual water. The bottleneck is not so much a global scarcity of water as a scarcity of decision power to choose among so many alternatives, all with numerous unwanted side effects.
Hydrotechnology is continually lowering the energy requirement for upgrading vast if not unlimited sources of used water and sea water to any desired quality, thus securing our future demands. For the short term interbasin transfer, including trade, is made ever more feasible.
Hydroinformatics has come up with a bag of new decision support tools and is developing object oriented approaches at a rapid rate. In particular, these efforts seem to secure stakeholder participation and enhance bottom-up input.
Hydroecology continues to educate us on instream water requirements to preserve a desired water and ecotone biological diversity and aestethic quality.
Hydropolitics is aided by a growing acceptance of principles for international water law. However, lacking binding laws, unilateral action in shared basins is still a problem.
Abbott, M B (2000): The democratisation of decision making processes in the water sector. Part 1. Accepted for publication in Journal of Hydroinformatics.
Abbott, M B and A Jonoski (2000): Same title as above, Part 2. Also accepted.
Allan, A (1997): 'Virtual' water: a long term solution for water short Middle East economies. Paper at the 1997 British Association Festival of Science, Univ. of Leeds.
Aubenas and Benasayag (1999): La Fabrication de l'Information. La Decouverte, Paris
Brox, O (1995): Dit vi ikke vil (What we don't want. Non-utopian planning for the next century) Exil, Oslo. (In Norwegian).
Damasio, A.R. (1994): Decartes' Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. G.P.Putnam's sons, New York.
Falkenmark, M. (1989): The Massive Water Scarcity now Threatening Africa. Ambio, vol 18, No 2.
Kahn, H, W Brown and L Martel (1976): The Next 200 Years. W Morrow & Co Inc., New York.
Naudascher, E (1996): Securing equitable allocation of projects benefits. Keynote address, International Conference on Aspects of Conflicts in Reservoir Development and Management Nordic Water Supply ASA (2000): Internet www.nws.no
Postel, S, G C Daily and P R Ehrlich (1996): Human Appropriation of Renewable Fresh Water. Science, Vol 271, Feb 3.
Revelle, C (1999) Optimizing Reservoir Resources. J Wiley & Sons.
Shuval, H (2000) Paper presented at the International Workshop: Regional Water Transfers in an Integrated Water Resources Management Perspective. University of Kalmar, Sweden. August 20-23.
Wenstøp, F and K Seip (2000): Legitimacy and Quality of multi-criteria environmental policy analysis - A meta analysis of five MCE studies in Norway. Accepted for publication in Int. Journ. of Multicriteria Decision Making.

Fig. 1 Individual water use (After Allan, 1997)

Fig. 2 Middle East and North
Africa water deficit (After Allan, 1997)