Ping Zeng1, Huiquan Chen, Baichuan
Ao and Ping
Ji
Dept. Cooling Water, China Institute of Water
Resources & Hydropower Research (IWHR),
POB 366, Beijing 100044, China
1Corresponding author. Tel:86 10 6845 4997; Fax:86 10 6841 2859;
E-mail:pzeng@iwhr.com.
Abstract: This paper deals with the numerical and experimental modeling of
turbulent tidal flow and heat transfer in coastal water. A depth-averaged k-
turbulence mathematical model is used to present the numerical
prediction. A full-field physical model with scale distortion, carried out in a
specially designed laboratory with some necessary facilities for controlling the
conditions, is described for simulating the turbulent tidal flow and heat
transfer in coastal water. Field investigations and prototype measurements are
concerned to provide the calibration and validation of the numerical prediction
and experimental simulation. In the engineering application study, the modeling
of turbulent heat transfer in coastal water near Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant is
conducted.
Keywords: heat transfer, turbulent flow, coastal water
In water engineering fields, research
on turbulent tidal flow and heat transfer in coastal water is important for the
purpose of solving the pressing problems involved in water resources, water
quality, environmental protection and engineering design etc. Many similar
studies had been carried out and the necessary modelling techniques to be
utilized in this paper had been solved in the past. Coeffe et al. (1987)
introduced some applications and developments of the numerical simulations in
coastal fields connected to thermal impact due to the heat transfer on tidal
current, by describing the contribution of LNH/EDF, France on heat dilution
studies in the vicinity of coastal power plants. Steiner (1973) carried out a
basic experiment in laboratory to directly measure the overall heat exchange
coefficient and the equilibrium water temperature from water surface to air.
Shaw & Lee (1976) made a semi-theoretical study of turbulent heat and mass
transfer over large bodies of water. Nystrom et al. (1981) conducted two
physical model studies to assist in the evaluation of the environmental impact
of once-through condenser cooling at the Indian Point Nuclear Generating
Station, New York. In recent decades, IWHR successfully conducted a large number
of numerical and experimental studies of engineering based modeling of turbulent
tidal flow and heat transfer in coastal water near power plant. The engineering
applications, concerning a series of numerical predictions, physical model
studies and field surveys, covered nearly all of the nuclear power plants and
most of the large-size thermal power plants in China, some of which give much
contribution for the present work in this paper.
In most engineering application studies on turbulent flow and heat transfer problem over natural coastal water, the plane length is large enough compared with water depth and the bottom is rough enough so that a nearly uniform vertical distribution of hydrodynamic and thermodynamic quantities can be supposed. The mathematical modeling equations, based on the depth-averaged variables, can be expressed as follows (McGuirk & Rodi, 1978),
where
in which,
= tidal level;
= water depth;
= depth-averaged velocity;
= depth-averaged flow temperature;
k = turbulent kinematics energy;
=turbulent dissipation rate; q = flow discharge source or sink;
= heat source input to or output
of the system;
= multiphase conjunction term;
= density of natural water;
= density of air; g = acceleration of
gravity;
= molecular viscosity, turbulent viscosity and effective viscosity
respectively;
and
=velocity and temperature dispersion coefficients;
and
=shear stresses at fluid surface and bed bottom respectively; W = wind speed; q = wind direction angle;
and
=new terms originating from depth-averaging; C = Chezy coefficient;
are
constants obtained from experiments for equilibrium turbulent boundary layers
and isotropic turbulence (Rodi, 1980).
The term
indicates the multiphase
conjunction of atmosphere with heated-water and cooling-water at the water
surface. A simple assumption is applied in the present paper, which supposed
that the atmosphere-phase is not interpenetrated with the fluid domain while the
phase interaction is represented by an additional heat transfer equation. Three
processes are considered to be responsible for the interaction: evaporation,
conduction, and back radiation. The prediction of these processes depends on
meteorological conditions above the coastal water surface, of which, the water
surface temperature, the wind and the air-water temperature difference are
driving forces. Following formulas presented by Chen et al. (1991) is used,
(7)
(8)
(9)
where K = surface heat exchange coefficient, which is the heat change resulted by per unit variance of water surface temperature for particular values of air temperature, water temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity; b = (P/0.623)(cP /L); cP = specific heat of water; L = latent heat of vaporization; s = Stefan-Boltzmann constant; TS = water surface temperature; T¥ = natural water temperature; Ta = ambient air temperature; eS = vapor pressure at the water surface; ea = vapor pressure of ambient air; subscript ’1.5’ represents the value at the height of 1.5m over the water surface; subscript ‘V’ represents the virtual temperature which defined by expression TV = T/(1-0.378e/P); e = vapor pressure; P = atmospheric pressure.
The approximation of the
governing equations is based upon a control volume approach which is expressed
briefly here, and the details was presented by Patankar (1980) and Spalding
(1981). The present calculations are performed on the body-fitted curvilinear
coordinates with a mesh freezing treatment onto the "out-field"
domain; so as to generate a zonal computational domain in which the irregular
coastline can be economically simulated (Zeng et al. 1995). Convergency of the
calculation can be obtained when a normalized residual for the day-averaged
water temperature falls below a small value.
The physical experiment in laboratory on the turbulent flow and heat transfer in coastal water described in this paper is to simulate both the coastal currents near the area of engineering system such as a power plant and the temperature distribution due to the heat transfer. The simulation covers all the process of heat discharged from the cooling water circulating system of power plant into the coastal water, till the dilution is developed well. A well designed laboratory experiment which can offer data and conditions enough for the turbulent flow and heat transfer study will generate reliable cases to satisfy the engineering applications and verify the numerical predictions. One of the major problems to overcome is that the limitation of physical model size in laboratory due to the laboratory area, and the coming experiment budget, often produce some difficulties for full-field coastal water. A distortion of model scale seems to be a practical approach for solving this problem over a large water body. Another major problem to fulfil the experiment requirement is that the difficulties to simulate a prototype climate in a model, so as to conduct a correct modeling of heat exchange between coastal water surface and atmosphere. A practical method is to carry out the experiment in a specially designed laboratory where some of the conditions, such as wind, air temperature and air humidity, can be simulated, meanwhile, to provide the verification by conservative test with respect to ambient effects in a conditioning chamber.
The experiments are performed in a specially designed laboratory with coastal tidal flow modeling, and also with some necessary facilities for controlling the conditions such as wind, air temperature and air humidity. Four sets of packaged air conditioners, with cooling capacity of 4´30KW, heating capacity of 4´25KW, air flow of 4´6200m3/h, are used in the laboratory. The bed and the banks of model are firstly built with brickwork and moulds filled up with sand, then coated with a layer of cement. The turbulent tidal current is generated with a coastal hydrodynamics system designed and manufactured by IWHR supported by The Ministry of Water Resources of China. The unsteady coastal tidal flow is simulated by a series of tidal generating pumps, which are set along the periphery of the model area to control the discharges into or out of the tidal open boundaries on physical model. These pumps work under the condition of the detailed discharge distribution along every open tidal boundary on model, which is provided with the numerical prediction or directly by the prototype measurement. The heated-water discharge and cooling-water intake of power plant are simulated by a closed circulating heating system, which consists of constant-temperature electric heater, flow meter, outlet pump, and intake pump.
The velocity measurements are performed with Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters (ADV-10MHZ, SonTek), accompanied with the tracing photography for compensating the surface currents. The distance between the ADV probes is chosen smaller where high velocity gradients are expected. The velocity measurement values turn out reliable down to about 1.0cm/s, while the uncertainty increases when approaching to zero velocity. Temperature measurements are carried out using a 3-D thermistor system, which consists of a multi-channel data acquisition system (YODAC-85S) and an infrared thermal video system (TVS-2000MKII, Nippon Avionics). YODAC-85S has a temperature reading of a resolution of 0.01°C and a measuring range from 0°C to 50°C in the actual study. TVS-2000MKII has a sensitivity of 0.01°C, and a measuring range from -40°C to 300°C. The probes in the 3-D thermistor system are installed on a frame which can trace the water surface movement in vertical direction to fit the water depth change automatically. The distance between temperature measuring points should be chosen smaller where closed to the heat discharging because the high temperature gradients are expected.
The engineering application is presented of a thermal impact study on environment of turbulent heat transfer in coastal water produced by Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located on the northern coast of Daya Bay, which is near the South China Sea and about 80km northeast to Hongkong. The plant was constructed in 1992, with a capacity of 1,800MW. The heated water discharge, from the condenser circulating system into coastal water, is 95m3/s, with a temperature rise of 10°C. To validate and verify the numerical and experimental results, field investigations regarding tidal flow and temperature distribution were carried out. The field measurement area covered 30km2 in Daya Bay; much attention was given to the coastal water near the plant. There were 13 comprehensive measuring stations, which were numbered with 9401 to 9413, and 3 tidal level measuring stations, which were numbered with H1 to H3 (see Fig.1), set in the measuring area of Daya Bay. Velocity, tidal level, water temperature and wind data on these measuring points were collected simultaneously. Additionally, ocean currents and water surface temperature distributions in Daya Bay were observed and analyzed by using the satellite remote sensing pictures.
A full-field physical model was studied which covered the coastal water area of 590km2 (See Fig.1). The full-field model was geometrically distorted with a ratio 1:10 of horizontal length to vertical depth. The horizontal scale was 1:1200 and the vertical scale was 1:120. Fig.1 is a layout of the full-field physical model in the laboratory. There were 200 temperature measuring points set over the model water, half of which were set near the middle of the water depth and the others near the bottom and the top of the water depth respectively. The simulated area with numerical model was of 830 km2, much larger than that with the full-field physical model, which covered nearly all of Daya Bay. The computational domain was subdivided into 6920 quadrilateral meshes. To achieve an adequate and economic meshing of the coastal water in the vicinity of the power plant, a multi-grid system was used.
Comparison of simulated and observed tidal flow patterns, by using the numerical model, the full-field physical model, and the satellite remote sensing pictures separately, at selected time steps during flood and ebb tides is shown in Fig.2. Comparison of the simulated time series tidal levels at selected stations is shown in Fig.3. It can be seen that both numerical model computation and physical model simulation agree well with the measurement on prototype. Fig.4 shows the comparison of the calculated temperature fields by numerical model with the depth-averaged results of temperature contours simulated by physical model, at maximum flood tide and ebb tide respectively. Fig.5 shows the comparison of day-averaged water surface temperature contours obtained by the field investigation and the experimental simulation separately. The water temperature contours predicted by the numerical model had some deviation from the water surface temperature contours of the experimental results. Two reasons were responsible for the deviation: the numerical model could not fully explain the observed temperature distributions due to a shortage of the depth-averaged numerical model; and the scale distortion of the full-field physical model which somewhat amplified the stratification of the heated flow. Fig.6 shows the comparison of the vertical temperature distributions between the prototype measurement and the physical model simulation at Stations 9403, 9405 and 9407 at chosen time steps. It can be seen that the stratification of water temperature was simulated well by the physical model although some discrepancies existed due to the influence of scale distortion as above-mentioned.
The present work has focused on the numerical
and experimental modeling of turbulent tidal flow and heat transfer in coastal
water near power plant, for the purpose of engineering applications. The
engineering application study was conducted by using the depth-averaged k-
turbulence model to obtain the full field temperature distribution, a
full-field physical model with scale distortion to analyze the detailed heat
exchange phenomena in coastal water, and the prototype measurement to calibrate
and validate the modeling. It has been shown that the modelling presented in
this paper can be used to simulate the heat exchange and obtain practical
results in coastal water.
Ackers, P., 1969. Modelling of heated water discharges, in Engineering Aspects of Thermal Pollution, ed. Parker & Krenkel, Vanderbilt, University Press.
Chen, H.Q., Li P.H. and Liu X.Z., 1990. Study on hydrodynamic and thermodynamic numerical model, IWHR report CW91-43, 1991.
Coeffe, Y., Courtier, S. and Latteux, B., 1987. Tidal sea mathematical modelling: current applications and future developments, Coastal Engineering, 11: 479-511.
Nystrom, J. B., Hecker, G. E. And Moy, H. C., 1981. Heated discharge in an estuary: case study, J. Hydraulics Division, Proc. ASCE, 107(11): 1371-1406.
McGuirk, J. and Rodi, W., 1978. A depth-averaged mathematical model for the near field of side discharges into open-channel flow, J. Fluid Mechanics, 86(4): 761-781.
Patankar, S.V., Numerical
heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York
(1980).
Rodi, W., 1980. Turbulent models and their application in hydraulics, IAHR State-of-the-art.
Ryan, J. P., Harleman, D. R. F. and Stolzenbach, K. D., 1974. Surface heat loss from cooling ponds, Water Resources Research, 10(5):930-938.
Spalding, D. B., 1981. A general purpose computer program for multi-dimensional one- and two-phase flow, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, North Holland Press, XXIII: 267-276.
Shaw C. Y. and Lee, Y. 1976. Wind-induced turbulent heat and mass transfer over large bodies of water, J. Fluid Mech. 77(4):645-664.
Steiner, F. W., 1973. Surface heat exchange from air to the atmosphere, MSc. Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Zeng P., Li Y. C. and Zhao W. Q., 1995. Numerical modelling of natural river network, Journal of Hydrodynamics, 7(3):22-31.

Fig.1 Layout of the full-field physical model.(*location of the measuring station corresponding to the prototype)

Fig.2 Comparison of simulated and observed tidal flow patterns, on Sept.5-6 of 1994.

Fig.3 Comparison of time series of tidal level, simulated by the full-field physical model and numerical model, with the field measurement data, at selected stations, on Aug.30-31 of 1994.
Fig.4 Comparison of the depth-averaged
temperature rise, on Aug.14-15 of 1994.
(filled area: numerical
prediction; – –
– : experimental simulation.)

Fig.5 Comparison of
the day-averaged water surface temperature rise.
(filled area: field
investigation; –
– – : experimental simulation.)

Fig.6 Comparison of
the vertical water temperature rise, on Aug.14-15 of 1994.
(–––:
prototype measurement; ----: experimental simulation.)