|
Chen,Yi-Ching |
Kung,Chen-Shan |
Shu,Shiang-Kueen |
|
Assistant Professor Dept. of Envir. Engring, Dayeh University, ChangHua, Taiwan, China 886-4-8528469 ext2365 yiching@mail.dyu.edu.tw |
Vice President Sinotech Engineering Consultants, Ltd. Taipei, Taiwan, China 886-2-27698388 kungcs@ms5.hinet.net |
Director-General Water Resources Bureau Ministry of Economic Affairs Taipei, Taiwan, China 886-2-27542080 |
Abstract: For the purpose of reasonable distributiion to water resources a sound management system of water-rights has been carried out. A computing model for examining available water quantity in rivers for water-rights is necessary to assist the authority to pre-examine the application of new water-rights as well as existent ones. A technique of “Link-List” is applied in this model to enhance the search algorithm for random allocation of water-rights and link them together in series. Two major rules, i.e. supplying available water quantity at the applied site and avoiding disadvantage to the related downstream existent water-rights, have to be checked appropriately to decide the approval or rejection for water-rights application.
Keywords: water-rights, Link-List, water quantity
The
present “registration” issue of water-rights always causes excessive and
inaccurate release of water to impede a reasonable utilization on water
resources. The “permit” institution is proposed by the administration of
water resources to control the limited resources more efficient (Chin, 1996).
For a sound management system of water-rights the setup of a considerable
examining model to check the issue of water-rights has been carried out. It is
part of the project on the study of potential water quantity for any section of
rivers in Taiwan. (Sinotech, 1998)
The procedure of examining is suitable for new application as well as
existent water-rights. The reasonable and sufficient water quantity for water-
rights issue is the goal of this model. It is simple and easy by using only
arithmetic computing here. A coupled rainfall-runoff model and Kriging
interpolation for potential water quantity at any section along rivers has been
done to complete the integration of examining model. (Sinotech, 1998)
By
the “registration” of water-rights administration does examin the water
quantity at the applied site only through analyses of flow records nearby.
However, the variety of water-rights could be affected by upstream water intakes
and it can cause disadvantage to the existent water-rights downstream, too.
Therefore, two examining criteria have to be satisfied before the “permit”
of water right issued (Chen, et. al., 1997 & 1999).
2.1.1 The availability of water quantity at the specified site
The upper limit of potential water supply (Qp), which is deducted initially by reserved quantity preserved for base-flow, ecological system, fishery, etc. (Chen, et. al. 1998), has to be deducted by the summation of quantity of existent upstream water intakes at j sites (S{Qwr}j-u/s) for availability. The asked quantity of new water-rights application at i site ({Qwr}i) has to be less than the availability of water ({Qav}i) there firstly.
RULE-1: {Qwr}i < {Qav}i = {Qp}I-S{Qwr}j-u/s (1)
2.1.2 The affection to downstream water supply
The diversion of new intake could cause insufficiency of water to its downstream water-rights. The priority of those existent water-rights is always higher than the new one. Therefore, checking of the availability at each downstream site k one by one for enough quantity after deducted by new application at i site is necessary.
RULE-2: {Qwr}i < {Qav}k-d/s (2)
The major frame of coupled examining model is shown as Figure 1. There are
four major modules linked as described below.
2.2.1 Water-rights management supporting module
The
needed background data of existent water-rights could be obtained for their
locations and diverted water quantity by this module. The approval and recording
for new water-rights has to be done here after examining processes passed, too.
2.2.2 Search module
A link-list technology is applied to connect the relationship between each
stream segments as well as water-rights sites. The related upstream and
downstream existent water-rights sites, even randomly allocated, could be traced
easily for specified site of new water-rights through link-list strings.
2.2.3 Potential water quantity module
A
coupled rainfall-runoff model and Kriging interpolation for potential water
quantity at any section along rivers has been done. The limitation of maximum
water quantity supplied by nature through statistical analysis can be calculated
here.
2.2.4 Examining module
The comparison of water quantity between availability and necessity for
those water-rights through two rules has to be satisfied before “permit” issued. It is the core of this coupled
model. The examined results will be passed back to management supporting module
for final decision.
Link-list is an efficient tool for searching in data structure technology.
It has been applied in high-performance computation for astrophysics (Monaghan,
1985) as well as particle hydrodynamics (Chen, 1997). The original concept is
that a string of sequential data is constructed to replace randomly and
spatially allocated data for convenient searching. Those data are chained
together through a specified relationship. Each data has to “remember” its
connecting one. By “count-off” from those data one by one a sequential data
string can be chained. Then, we can easily trace those locations of related data
by this one-dimensional string instead of using neighborhood searching in
two-dimensional grids system.
Two
sets of memory block are needed as the head of chain (HOC) for tracing the head
data for tracing at specified area and link-list (LL) for storing those related
data one by one. If there are n
records of data Ni (i=1~n) among string Mj, we can trace
the head of Mj by HOC(Mj)=N1 and get the next
data in sequency by LL(N1)=N2, LL(N2)=N3,LL(N3)=N4,…until
LL(Nn)=0 to the end of string. The principle of data structure for
link-list is “First-In-First-Out”(FIFO). Reversely, those sets of string HOC
and LL are constructed by similar procedures.
A tree type of river structure can be divided into several segments by
lots of nodes. Those nodes are always located at connection of two or more
tributaries. As shown in Figure 2 a typical tree structure river is divided to
six levels of segments. There are three kinds of link-list strings for
connecting, i.e. LLD for downstream link, LLU for upstream link and LLS for side
link at the same level. Those link-list strings can be constructed through
tracing the upstream and downstream nodes for each segment and chaining them
together.
In Figure 2, if we want to trace the upstream and downstream segments for
3E, then upstream segments such as 4E,4F,4G,5A,5B,6A,6B are traced by LLU and
LLS and downstream segments such as 2B,1A are traced by LLD, too.
In the same way those water-rights at each segment can be linked and
traced by link-list technology, too. Another set of string LLWR is needed for
water-rights connection. If we can trace the related segments for the specified
position of water-rights first, the water-rights sites at each segment are
linked thereafter. Now, we can trace all the related water-rights sites upstream
and downstream for the new proposed water-rights site.
Due to fast development of hydraulic technology the interference by
artificial structures can cause the flow conditions much different to natural
one. Those situations have to be considered and modified for examining model.
They would be discussed below.
For a condition much similar to natural condition no artificial facility divert the natural flow condition. Monthly potential water flow (Qp) can be calculated by the “Potential water quantity module” for those sites of existent water-rights. As shown in Figure 3 there are 11 existent intake sites are located along a stream with the same water-rights Qwr=0.01cms. If we need to set a new intake #20 between #2 and #3 sites with water-rights Qwr=0.15cms. Comparing the new discharge with existent intakes as shown in Table 1a we can find that the insufficiency of water in July only. By single month analysis in July we can find that the availability of downstream sites of #10 and #3 can not be satisfied in Table 1b. However, if we adjust the intake discharge in July down to Qwr=0.05cms, then permit can be issued with satisfied examining.
For hydraulic electricity a pump station can be constructed
for this purpose. The tailwater released to downstream site or not could affect
the water-rights issuing as example shown in Figure
4.
The background conditions are similar to those in example 1 and a new #20
water-rights for pumping with Qwr=0.06cms
is proposed between #9 and #8 sites. If the tailwater is diverted out, the
single month analysis as shown in Table 2a indicates the problems in July at
existent sites #2 and #8. However, if tailwater released just downstream with
minor loss to 0.04cms, then the problem can be fixed and permit can be issued as
shown in Table 2b.
For a special condition by adding flow (Qre) at specified site from other catchment the availability for downstream sites can be recharged, Qav = Qp - S{Qwr}u/s+Qre , which is similar to the result in Table 2b. The credit could be increased for new applications of water-rights.
A reservoir can totally vary the natural
condition to artificial controls. The dam blocks the river to store natural flow
for electricity, flood mitigation, drought control, etc. purposes. The river can
be divided into two parts as ordinary condition upstream of reservoir and total
flow adjustment downstream. The latter condition is concerned at this section.
The availability for those existent water-rights sites are change to Qav
= Qp‘+QR-S{Qwr}u/s-R , in
which QR=outflow by reservoir release, Qp’ =potential
sideflow from catchment downstream the reservoir and {Qwr}u/s-R=existent
upstream intakes between specified site and reservoir. The outflow by reservoir
release QR is controlled by reservoir operation and upstream inflow
hydrograph. The “Potential
water quantity module” has to be modified to couple with the special condition
for reservoir.
For the conditions in Example 1, if we need to set a new intake #20
between #2 and #3 sites with Qwr=0.25cms, we cannot go through
between March and august as shown in Table 4a. For the similar background
conditions as shown in Example 1 cited, however, the upstream of #8 water-rights
site is replaced by a reservoir with QR=0.26cms as shown in Figure 5.
The availability of downstream existent intake site is increased and the problem
in Table 4a is fixed as shown in Table 4b. The term SUM[Qwr-u/s] in Table 4b is negative due to recharge including released
reservoir outflow. The artificial control can properly modify the unbalanced
monthly natural flow distribution for human utilization more efficient.
Due to the loose control for releasing water-rights without considerate
examining the total sum of water-rights quantity may exceed much more than the
supply of potential water quantity in rivers. A rigorous model is necessary for
inquiring and checking a reasonable and realizable application of water-rights.
The administration of water resources should restore the existent water-rights
for efficient and accurate management.
[1] Managhan, J.J. (1985), “Particle Methods for Hydrodynamics”, Computer Physics Report, Vol.3, pp.71-124.
[2] Chin, J.C. (1996). “The Institution of Water-rights in Taiwan”, Proceeding of Water-rights Management Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, pp.1-13. (in Chinese).
[3] Chen, Y.C., Kung, C.S. & Shu, S.K. (1997). “The Model of Examining Available Water Quantity for Water-rights in Rivers”, Journal of Taiwan Water Conservancy, Vol.45, No.1, pp24-32. (in Chinese).
[4] Chen, Y.C. (1997). “The Application of Random-Walk Particle Method in Numerical Simulations”, Proceeding of Computer Application in Civil and Hydraulic Engineering Conference, Shinchu, Taiwan, pp.1031-1041. (in Chinese).
[5] Sinotech Engineering Consulting Ltd. (1998). “The Study of Potential Water Quantity for Any Section of River in Taiwan” ,The 3rd Annual Report prepared for Water Resources Bureau. (in Chinese).
[6] Chen, Y.C., Kung, C.S. & Shu, S.K. (1998). “The Reserved Water Quantity and Water-rights in Rivers”, Journal of Engineering Environment, Vol.17, pp.79-85. (in Chinese).
[7] Chen, Y.C., Kung, C.S. & Shu, S.K. (1999). “The Setup of Examining Model for Available Water Quantity upon Water-rights in Rivers”, The 10th Conference for water resources, July 1999, Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese).
Table 1 The examining results for example 1
|
(a) Summary |
|
For
New W.R.# 20 |
|
Period Qwr
Qp SUM[Qwr-u/s] Qav
MIN[Qav-d/s] STATUS |
|
1 0.150 0.380 0.060 0.320 0.340 OK |
|
2 0.150 0.450 0.060 0.390 0.420 OK |
|
3 0.150 0.330 0.060 0.270 0.290 OK |
|
4 0.150 0.220 0.060 0.160 0.160 OK |
|
5 0.150 0.210 0.060 0.150 0.150 OK |
|
6 0.150 0.290 0.060 0.230 0.250 OK |
|
7 0.150 0.110 0.060 0.050 0.050 NG |
|
8 0.150 0.210 0.060 0.150 0.160 OK |
|
9 0.150 0.450 0.060 0.390 0.420 OK |
|
10 0.150 0.540 0.060 0.480 0.520 OK |
|
11 0.150 0.420 0.060 0.360 0.390 OK |
|
12 0.150 0.350 0.060 0.290 0.310 OK |
|
(b) Single month analysis |
|
MONTH= 7 |
|
RULE 1- CHECK U/S: Qav-j > Qwr-j |
|
W.R.# 20 Qav-j [ 0.050] < Qwr-j [ 0.150] N.G.! |
|
RULE 2- CHECK D/S: Qwr-j < Qav-d/s |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.150] > W.R.# 10 Qav-d/s [ 0.050] N.G.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.150] > W.R.# 3 Qav-d/s [ 0.050] N.G.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.150] < W.R.# 5 Qav-d/s [ 0.340] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.150] < W.R.# 4 Qav-d/s [ 0.340] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.150] < W.R.# 11 Qav-d/s [ 104.910] O.K.! |
Table 2 The examining results for example 2
|
(a) Single month analysis(tailwater diverted out) |
|
MONTH= 7 |
|
RULE 1- CHECK U/S: Qav-j > Qwr-j |
|
W.R.# 20 Qav-j [ 0.060] > Qwr-j [ 0.060] O.K.! |
|
RULE 2- CHECK D/S: Qwr-j < Qav-d/s |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 10 Qav-d/s [ 0.060] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 3 Qav-d/s [ 0.060] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] > W.R.# 2 Qav-d/s [ 0.050] N.G.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] > W.R.# 8 Qav-d/s [ 0.050] N.G.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 5 Qav-d/s [ 0.350] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 4 Qav-d/s [ 0.350] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 11 Qav-d/s [
104.920] O.K.! |
|
(b) Single month analysis(tailwater released) |
|
MONTH= 7 |
|
RULE 1- CHECK U/S: Qav-j > Qwr-j |
|
W.R.# 20 Qav-j [ 0.060] > Qwr-j [ 0.060] O.K.! |
|
RULE 2- CHECK D/S: Qwr-j < Qav-d/s |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 10 Qav-d/s [ 0.100] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 3 Qav-d/s [ 0.100] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 2 Qav-d/s [ 0.090] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 8 Qav-d/s [ 0.090] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 5 Qav-d/s [ 0.390] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 4 Qav-d/s [ 0.390] O.K.! |
|
W.R.# 20 Qwr-j [ 0.060] < W.R.# 11 Qav-d/s [ 104.960] O.K.! |
Table 3 The examining results for example 3
|
(a) Summary (ordinary condition w/o reservoir) |
|
For New W.R.# 20 |
|
Period Qwr Qp SUM[Qwr-u/s] Qav MIN[Qav-d/s] STATUS |
|
1 0.250 0.380 0.060 0.320 0.340 OK |
|
2 0.250 0.450 0.060 0.390 0.420 OK |
|
3 0.250 0.330 0.060 0.270 0.290 OK |
|
4 0.250 0.220 0.060 0.160 0.160 NG |
|
5 0.250 0.210 0.060 0.150 0.150 NG |
|
6 0.250 0.290 0.060 0.230 0.250 NG |
|
7 0.250 0.110 0.060 0.050 0.050 NG |
|
8 0.250 0.210 0.060 0.150 0.160 NG |
|
9 0.250 0.450 0.060 0.390 0.420 OK |
|
10 0.250 0.540 0.060 0.480 0.520 OK |
|
11 0.250 0.420 0.060 0.360 0.390 OK |
|
12 0.250 0.350 0.060 0.290 0.310 OK |
|
(b) Summary (by reservoir adjustment) |
|
For New W.R.# 20 |
|
Period Qwr Qp SUM[Qwr-u/s] Qav MIN[Qav-d/s] STATUS |
|
1 0.250 0.380 -0.240 0.620 0.640 OK |
|
2 0.250 0.450 -0.240 0.690 0.720 OK |
|
3 0.250 0.330 -0.240 0.570 0.590 OK |
|
4 0.250 0.220 -0.240 0.460 0.460 OK |
|
5 0.250 0.210 -0.240 0.450 0.450 OK |
|
6 0.250 0.290 -0.240 0.530 0.550 OK |
|
7 0.250 0.110 -0.240 0.350 0.350 OK |
|
8 0.250 0.210 -0.240 0.450 0.460 OK |
|
9 0.250 0.450 -0.240 0.690 0.720 OK |
|
10 0.250 0.540 -0.240 0.780 0.820 OK |
|
11 0.250 0.420 -0.240 0.660 0.690 OK |
|
12 0.250 0.350 -0.240 0.590 0.610 OK |

Fig. 2 The link-list of segmernts in tree type
river structure

Fig. 3 River
segments and water- rights in Example 1 (ordinary condition)

Fig. 4 River
segments and water-rights in Example 2 (pump station)
