Frank
Toensmann and Tobia
Dept. of Hydraulic and Water Resources
Engineering,
University of Kassel, Kurt-Wolters-Straße 3,
D-34109 Kassel
Tel.: +49 561 804 2749, Fax: +49 561 3952,
E-Mail: wawi@wasser.bauingenieure.uni-kassel.de
Abstract: The Lahn project is
one of about 150 projects, which is worked on in the frame of the EU-program
“INTERREG IIC Rhine-Meuse-Activities (IRMA)”. Based on the strategies and
proceedings directions, which were published by the Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft
Wasser (LAWA) in 1995, a concept for decentral flood defence for the Hessian
river Lahn is developed.The hydrological effectivity will be computed
for the systems conditions and three development scenarios. Based on this, a
design proposal will be worked out, which, in turn, is going to be put in
concrete terms for eight sub- and three example-projects.
Keywords: river flood defence concept, decentral flood
defence, river basin model, Lahn/Germany
Trigger points
for this project were the christmas floods in 1993 and 1995 in the Rhine-Meuse-catchment
area. In the frame of the INTERREG IIC – initiative of the European Union the
operational program IRMA was developed. IRMA is an abbreviation for INTERREG –
Rhine-Meuse-Activities. The program contains about 150 flood defence projects in
the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France and Switzerland. The national
confinancier is the Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und
Forsten (Hessian Ministry of Environment, Agriculture and Forestry) with its
program “natural oriented streams”.
The Lahn project
consists of the scientific work, described in this paper, and of the design for
three example-projects and its sub-projects, which are planned and put into
order in close co-operation with the scientific work. Members of the scientific
work group are the Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde (Federal Institute of
Hydrology), the Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, the Technical University
Darmstadt, the Technical University Braunschweig and the University of Kassel.
According to
LAWA (1995) three strategies for flood defence concepts, as listed in tab. 1,
exist. These are Natural flood retention, Technical flood defence, and Extensive
flood precautions. The strategies comprise instructions for measures, e.g.
building precautions: building, living and dwelling adapted to possible flood
risks.
In the publications and articles dealing with future flood protection (LAWA 1995;Hess. Ministerium 1999; Plate 2000; Samuels 2000; LAWA 2000) emphasis is put on the fact that the main point of interest in a flood defence concept should lie in the strategies of natural retention and extensive flood precautions. The technical flood defence, i.e. mainly dams and flood control reservoirs built between 1945 and 1980, should stay in the background due to low public acceptance.
Table 1 Strategies and proceeding directions
|
Natural Flood Retention |
Technical Flood Defence |
Extensive Flood Precautions |
|
Retainment on the plain - suitable, location- - avoiding the drain-off of - surface-sensitive - partial lay-off of farm land Water retention by the river and flood plain - river-restoration - buying back of river - relocation of dikes - mini retainers |
Flood Control Retainers - small retainers, flood Local measures - protection of new building - extension of the discharge Diversion - flood depressions - flood channels - culverts |
Precautions for the countryside - balancing of the water- - definition by law of flooding - keeping the flooding zones Flood policy - flood warning service - alarm and operational Building precautions - building, living and dwelling Risk provision - flood risk insurance |
With its major project “Retention Register”, the state of Hesse mainly supports the water retention in rivers and flood plains. The focus is on the redevelopment and activation of retention areas. This also includes relocation of dikes and the reduction of peak discharge and discharge volume by means of engineering measures, regulation of morphology and initial planting.
Sometimes
another classification is made, namely decentral, semicentral and central
retainers. The decentral or mini retainers are part of the “natural flood
retention”-strategy, while the semicentral or small and central retainers
(dams, flood control reservoirs) are part of the technical flood defence-strategy,
(tab. 1.), (Assmann et al. 1996; Tönsmann 2000a).
According to these principles, flood defence
concepts have already been realised in a few small catchment areas (Tönsmann
1997; Bauer 1999; Tönsmann et al. 2000). However, so far there is no systematic
investigation and planning for a middle-sized catchment area, as it is currently
done in the Lahn project.
The following
methods (models and procedures) are at our disposal:
l
Models for the
determination of spatial and temporal distribution of statistical and maximum
precipitation
l
river basin
models
l
methods of
water level computation
l
benefit/cost
analyes
l
evaluations of
environmental assessment
With these methods a flood defence concept — as shown in Fig.1 — can
be designed.

Fig. 1 Course of planning for a flood defence concept
The first step is to apply the entrance data of the precipitation to a river basin model in order to calculate the actual condition. Water level computations are used to determine the flood plains appertaining to the statistical flood events. Useful is a comparison with past flood events or with the flood plains established by the authorities. The first step of the benefit/cost analysis is to determine the damages of past events in order to be able to find out the damaging potential for the flood plains of rarer flood events as well. Based on this data, the outline for the planned flood defence project has to be laid down. According to the planned objective, the main point of interest will either lie in the natural flood retention, the technical flood defence or extensive flood precautions. If engineering measures are required, one should start with a technical pre-feasibility study, sketch out different variants, and evaluate the respective costs. By means of an iterative procedure, the hydrological and hydraulic efficiency for the different variants will be examined and the benefit/cost ratio determined. Hydrological efficiency is the size of reduction of peak discharge and wave volume, hydraulic efficiency is the change of water level height. An assessment of environmental compatibility will be carried out in order to determine economically sensible variants. Here, too, the planning procedure will pass various iteration loops in order to bring forth the variant with the least possible remaining risk. Based on this, compensation measures will be suggested and a proposal for implementation prepared.
The above-mentioned methods are
also used in the Lahn-project. However, in a catchment area of 5,964 km², not
all methods could be applied in similar depth to the entire area. Therefore, the
focus of the work lies on the computation of different system cases for the
catchment area with the river basin model in the line of the “natural flood
retention”-strategy. For the following system conditions calculations are
carried out: actual situation 1998, situation 2010 without flood defence
measures, rainwater retainers in urban areas, unsealing of areas respectively
infiltration of rainwater, retainers in side valleys, relocation of dikes,
activation of retention in the flood plain, restoration, change of land use
outside of populated areas, sub-projects, increase of precipitation-heights and
potential natural condition.
The computations are made by the
Leichtweiß-Institute at the Technical University Braunschweig/Germany with the
program NAXOS, developed there. Part of the system cases are models (Leitbilder),
which are known from ecological development concepts (DVWK 1996).
In Fig. 2 the potential leitbild is
differentiated from the integral leitbild. The potential leitbild means “an
approach to natural development, which would only be accessible, if there were
no limitations of social and economic reasons”. It is therefore a maximum
integral leitbild, which, in the river basin model is tested with the system
case “potential natural situation” for its hydrological efficiency. The
integral leitbild will give the probable realisable situation in three
scenarios.
In the leitbilds, the parts
catchment, floodplain and river are differentiated. The leitbilds will be
developed for catchment areas (ecoregions), which differ mainly in morphology
and topography (broadness of the valley, longitudinal slope).
The water level computations, the benefit/cost analysis and the
evaluation of the environmental assessment cannot be applied to the whole
catchment area, their application is restricted
to the sub- (depending on investigations during the planning process) and
example
Principles of Development
|
||||
|
Catchment, Floodplains & River |
Landscape Continuity |
Dynamics & Diversity |
Resiliency & Threshold |
Factors of Time & Sustainability |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
||
|
|
naturally-attributed
character of Catchment, Floodplain and River Systems Potential Leitbild (potential guiding
principle) |
|
||
|
Information
of public opinion |
ecological
deficit assessment |
Co-ordination
of Participation & Affectation |
||
|
|
Cultural
and historical development of Catchment, Floodplain and River Systems unchanged
uses and restrictions development objective -
integral Leitbild (integral guiding
principle) |
|
||
|
Selection
of Variants according to : |
||||
|
Type of measures |
Transformation of river-margin conditions |
Ecological Impacts |
Social Impacts |
Economic Impacts |
Development
Concept
|
||||
Fig. 2 Function and position of guiding principles and development objectives in planning of ecological concepts (after DVWK 1996).
projects (fig.3). The three example-projects are:
(1) Kleebach
catchment area near Gießen-Allendorf
(2) Floodplain
of the Lahn between Niederweimar and Staufenberg
(3) Lahnloop
near Wehrda.
The achieved
results should be transferred to other parts of the Lahn catchment area. This,
however, is difficult, the scale problems should only be pointed out here (DVWK
1997).
In eight
sub-projects the implementation has already started (Tab. 2). The outline of the
projects makes clear that these projects are examples of the “natural flood
retention”.-strategy. The most interesting projects are the reactivation of
the furcation channels near Sterzhausen and the relocations of dikes, which give
a good idea of future flood protection measures (Lang et al. 2000). A remaining
problem is the fact that all sub-projects are supposed to be finished in
December 2001. An extension will be given only under special circumstances.
Table 2 Selected sub-projects in the catchment area of the Lahn river in Hesse

、

Fig. 3 Catchment area of the Lahn river and position of sub- and example projects.
References
Assmann, André, Bernd Friedel, Hartmut Gündra, Gert Schukraft und Achim Schulte, 1996: Dezentraler Hochwasserschutz als geeignete Alternative zu großen Rückhaltebecken. Der Bürger im Staat. Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg.
Bauer, Holger, 1999: Aktivierung von Retentionsraum an der Gesprenz in Hessen. Wasser und Abfall, no. 4, pp. 52-55.
Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau e. V. (DVWK), 1996: Fluss und Landschaft – Ökologische Entwicklungskonzepte. Merkblätter zur Wasserwirtschaft 240. Bonn: Kommissionsvertrieb Wirtschafts- und Verlagsgesellschaft Gas und Wasser mbH.
Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau e. V. (DVWK), 1997: Maßnahmen zur naturnahen Gewässerstabilisierung. Kap. 2: Gewässerökologische Rahmenbedingungen pp. 3 bis 12. Schriften 118. Bonn: Kommissionsbetrieb Wirtschafts- und Verlagsgesellschaft Gas und Wasser mbH.
Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, 1999: Neue Wege im Hochwasserschutz. Selfpublisher. Wiesbaden.
Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser (LAWA), 1995: Leitlinien für einen zukunftsweisenden Hochwasserschutz. Selfpublisher. Berlin.
Lang, Tobias und Frank Tönsmann, 1999: Vorbeugender Hochwasserschutz im Einzugsgebiet der hessischen Lahn. Zusammenfassende Projektbeschreibung. Kasseler Wasserbau-Materialien, volume 9/1999, Herkules Verlag Kassel.
Lang, Tobias und Frank Tönsmann, 2000: Preventive Flood Control in the Catchment Area of the Lahn River – an IRMA project. Kassel Reports of Hydraulic Engineering, no. 9/2000, pp. H-79 to H-89. Herkules Verlag Kassel.
Plate, Erich J., 2000: Flood Management as Part of Sustainable Development. Kassel Reports of Hydraulic Engineering no 9/2000, pp. F-11 to F 24. Herkules Verlag Kassel.
Samuels, P. G., 2000: An Overview of Flood Estimation and Flood Prevention. Kassel Reports of Hydraulic Engineering no. 9/2000, pp. G-1 to G-11. Herkules Verlag Kassel.
Tönsmann, Frank, 1997: Bemessung von “grünen” Rückhalten. Out of: Wasserbau-Mitteilungen der Technischen Hochschule Darmstadt, no. 98.
Tönsmann, Frank, 2000a: The Kassel Concept for River Flood Defence. Kassel Reports of Hydraulic Engineering no. 9/2000, pp. G-245 to G-260. Herkules Verlag Kassel.
Tönsmann, Frank, Bernhard Kühne und Klaus Röttcher, 2000: Environmentally sound Flood Defence in Northern Hesse: A worldwide Project of the World Exhibition in Hanover (EXPO 2000). Kassel Reports of Hydraulic Engineering no. 9/2000, pp. I-1 to I-17. Herkules Verlag Kassel.
Tönsmann, Frank (ed.), 2000b: Vorbeugender Hochwasserschutz im Einzugsgebiet der hessischen Lahn. Lahnkonferenz am 20.09.2000. Kasseler Wasserbau-Forschungsberichte und –Materialien. Volume 11/2000. Herkules Verlag Kassel.