M.H. Omid1 and
R. Narayanan2
1Postgraduate Student, Department of Civil and Construction Eng., UMIST, Manchester.
2Reader,
Department of Civil and Construction Eng., UMIST, Manchester.
Abstract:
The erosion of a layer of sediment of nearly
uniform size on a rigid smooth bed due to clear and sediment-laden water has
been investigated. The erosion takes place as a wave travelling downstream. The
speed of the wave front is related to the upstream velocity of flow. The
thickness of the erosion wave is found to be a function of the upstream specific
energy. The structure of sediment motion with sediment-laden water is different
from that with clear water particularly in the region upstream of the erosion
front. The studies are expected to be useful in determining the time required to
flush out a layer of deposited sediments in channels.
Keywords: erosion, deposited sediment, hydraulics, irrigation, sewers
The transport of
sediments along rigid channels is of importance to the design and operation of
sewers, lined irrigation canals and channel in treatment works. For the design
of sewers, the sediment transporting capacity of flow in a rigid circular
channel is determined for the case of the so-called limit of deposition (Novak
and Nalluri, May et al, Mayerle and Ackers et al). Nalluri et al, Ab Ghani, May
and Perrusquia and Nalluri provide empirical equations for sediment transport in
circular channels with deposited bed.
The purpose of the
present investigations is to study how a layer of uniform sediments of limited
extent resting on the rigid bed of a rectangular channel is eroded by flow of
clear water and water with different sediment concentrations. The study is
restricted to steady incoming flow and sediments of nearly uniform size moving
purely along the bed.
Experiments were carried out in a tilting flume 305 mm wide and 12.2 m long with glass sides and smooth bed, and of rectangular cross-section (Figure 1). The flume is provided with a sediment trap at its downstream end. The sediments collected in the basket were weighed by a digital weighing scale. A tailgate consisting of a set of rotating flaps provided various degrees of openings without causing undue backwater effects into the channel. Experiments were carried out both with clear water and with water with sediments at different concentrations. In the latter experiments, an electromagnetic vibrator placed at 5 m upstream of the test reach is used to inject sediment at desired uniform rates. Different diameters of sediments, thickness of sediment layer, flow rates, water depths, channel slopes and rates of sediment injection have been considered in the experiments.
Figure 2 shows typically the bed profiles assumed by a stretch of sediment layer at different stages of erosion due to clear water. Figure 2a shows simply the initial condition of the sediment bed of uniform thickness. As the erosion starts to occur, a raised bed develops at the front very quickly (Figure 2b). In Figure 2b are also shown the main features of the erosion wave in cross-section and the symbols used in this paper to denote various quantities. After an elapse of certain time depending on the velocity of flow and the sediment diameter, the layer of sediments attains a developed state as shown in Figure 2b and 2c. The front of this erosion wave in plan is V-shaped (Figure 2d). Sediments eroded at the front travel along the nearly flat crest of the erosion wave and deposit at the downstream end at a sloping step.
When the incoming flow carries sediments, the sediment layer on the rigid bed behaves similar to that with clear water but the leading edge of the layer takes up a V-shape with its vertex pointing upstream as shown in Figure 2 by breaker line. The structure of erosion and the movement of the sediments at the layer of sediments are essentially the same as with clear water. However for a given velocity, as the sediment concentration increases, the vertex of the erosion front moves forward because some of the incoming sediments are deposited over there. The remaining sediments along with those eroded at the front of the erosion wave move along the crest of the wave to be deposited downstream. Further increase of sediment supply produces pockets of sediment deposit upstream of the triangular front of the erosion wave. With elapse of time these deposits grow bigger to occupy the whole width of the flume. However these upstream deposits of injected sediments are separated from the layer which is placed before the start of the experiments and whose erosion is of concern in this paper.
The back of the wave moves faster than the front so that the crest length increases with time. The frontal speed decreases with increase of sediment concentration in the incoming flow. In the developed state of erosion, as seen in Figure 2b dS1 remains essentially constant. Temporal variations of thickness of the erosion wave is shown in Figure 3. The region downstream of the wave is slowly eroded away and is a flat bed or is made up of dunes depending on the sediment diameter, initial thickness of the bed and the flow velocity. When the flow velocity is sufficiently large, the dunes disintegrate to form sediment pockets separated by clear rigid bed of the channel.
As mentioned already, the leading edge of the sediment deposit erodes to assume a form similar to a moving wave, which in its developed state is of nearly uniform mean thickness dS1. In Figure 4 dS1 is shown as a function of the specific energy ES upstream of the erosion wave. dS1 and ES are made dimensionless with respect to D50. D50 is sediment diameter for which 50% of the sediment is finer. Figure 4 includes all the data collected for various sediment diameters, initial thickness, slopes and flow rates considered in our investigations. Erosion wave thickness was found to be almost independent of the concentration of sediment inflow upstream of the deposited bed. This is demonstrated in Figure 5 where the thickness of the erosion wave is plotted against the upstream specific energy for different inflow sediment concentrations.
The speed at which the erosion front VS1 in clear water conditions moves downstream is shown as dependent on the upstream velocity of the flow Vup in Figure 6a, 6b and 6c. Both VS1 and Vup are non-dimensionalised using [g (SS-1) D50]0.5. g is the gravitational acceleration and Ss is the relative density of the sediments. Each of the figures is relevant to a range of di/D50 as shown in Figure 6, di being the initial thickness of the sediment bed before the erosion starts. Knowledge of this speed is important from the point of view of time required to flush out a given layer of sediment from the rigid channel.
When sediments are injected into the flow upstream of deposited bed, the velocity of erosion wave decreases with the increase of sediment concentration of the incoming flow. Figure 7 shows the erosion wave velocity as a function of the upstream flow velocity for different sediment concentration. Evidently, larger flow velocity and less concentration of sediment inflow cause greater speed of retreat of the front of sediment deposit. The results shown in Figure 7 are relevant to sediment size of 1.33 mm and initial bed thickness of 20mm.
The erosion of a layer of nearly uniform sediments on a rigid bed in a rectangular channel by incoming flow of different concentrations has been investigated experimentally. Only the motion of the sediments purely along the bed is considered.
(1) An erosion wave is formed with a V-shaped front followed by a raised bed over the initial bed of nearly uniform thickness and then a step at the downstream end. Sediments eroded at the front move along the raised bed to be deposited at the step downstream. The length of the wave (crest length) increases with time till the downstream step reaches the sediment trap.
(2) The thickness of the raised bed is shown to be a function of the specific energy of the flow and the diameter of the sediment.
(3) The wave front moves downstream with speed that is related to the upstream flow velocity, diameter of sediments, sediment concentration of incoming flow and initial thickness of the bed.
(4) The results presented in this paper can be used to find the time required to flush out cohesion less deposited sediments from rectangular channels by means of clear water.
References
[1] Novak, P. and Nalluri, C. (1975) Sediment transport in smooth fixed bed channels, Journal of the Hydraulic division (ASCE), 101, HY9, 1139-1154.
[2] May, R.W.P. et al, (1989), Self-cleansing conditions for sewers carrying sediment, Hydraulic Research Ltd. (Wallingford), Report SR 221.
[3] Mayerle, R. (1988), Sediment transport in rigid boundary channels, PhD thesis, Department of Civil Eng., University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
[4] Ackers et al (1996), Design of sewers to control sediment problem, CIRIA Report No. 141, London, England.
[5] Nalluri, C. et al (1994), Sediment transport over deposited bed in sewers, Journal of Water Science Technology, 29, No 1-2, 125-133.
[6] Ab. Ghani, A. (1993), Sediment transport in sewers, PhD thesis, Department of Civil Eng., University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
[7] May, R.W.P. (1993), Sediment transport in sewers with deposited beds, Hydraulic Research Ltd., (Wallingford), England, Report No. SR 320.
[8] Perrusquia, G. and Nalluri, C. (1995), Modelling of bed load transport in pipe channels, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on transport and sedimentation of solid particles, Prague.

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus

Cross-Section
at the centre line

Fig. 2 Bed profiles during various stages of erosion
Fig. 3 Temporal variations of thickness of the erosion wave
Fig. 4 Thickness of erosion wave as a function of specific energy

Fig. 5 Comparison between erosion wave thicknesses in different concentrations of incoming flow
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6 Velocity of erosion wave as a function of flow velocity
Fig.7 Comparison of result of erosion wave velocity for different sediment concentration of incoming flow