PREDICTION OF TURBULENCE FLOW WITH EFFECTS OF STREAMLINE CURVATURE

 

 

Wei Wen Li1, 2   Liu Yu Ling1   Li Jian Zhong1

(1 Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)

(2 Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

1,2 Ph.D.Wei, doing the research work in the State Key Laboratory of Coastal and

Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology. 

 

Abstract: A mathematical model for predicting turbulence flows with effects of streamline curvature under orthogonal curvilinear coordinates is developed in this paper .The SIMPLEC solution procedure has been used for the transformed governing equations in  the transformed domain. The Loci of flow reversal of the seperated flows over a backward facing step are employed to test the capability of the proposed turbulence model in capturing the effects of local curvature .The comparision between the computed results and experimental data shows a satisfactory agreement . 

Keywords: orthogonal curvilinear coordinates, mathematical model, effects of streamline curvature

1    INTRODUCTION

The tremendous improvement of computer capabilities, in memory and speed, has enabled accurate numerical predictions of turbulent flows. Due to the closure problem of the governing equations for turbulence flows, numerous turbulence models have been proposed. The eddy-viscosity type of turbulence closure modeling has demonstrated a variety of good numerical predictions both qualitatively and quantitatively. Among them, the k- model is the most widely employed isotropic two-equation model. It has been extensively applied to different turbulent flow problems. However, the standard k- model appears to be insufficient in predicting the complex turbulence shear layers, such as flows subjected to curvature and rotation. The main reason is that the streamline curvature produces unexpectedly large changes in boundary layer properties and that the eddy-viscosity for standard k- model is isotropic. So several researchers have discussed the sensitivity of turbulence flow characteristics to even small amounts of mean streamline curvature. For example, in the study by Kreith [1] and in subsequent investigations by Thomann[2] and Mayle et al [3] , it has been shown that the best flux through the concave wall of a curved channel can be up to 33% larger, and through the convex wall 15%smaller, relative to that through the walls of a straight channel. Therefore, numerous models have been proposed in the last two decades to account for the effects of streamline curvature, such as [4-9]etc.

In order to combine the simplicity (i.e., easily adopted into other programs or models ), generality (suitable for different geometries ), physical rationale, and efficiency (less computing time), the present study applies the curvature correction method by Launder et al. And Sharma[7] in the two-equation turbulence model under orthogonal curvilinear coordinates. Thus, a mathematical model for prediction of turbulence flow with effects of streamline curvature under orthogonal curvilinear coordinates has been established and will be widely used in the prediction of complex turbulence flows in hydraulic engineering.

2    MATHEMATICAL MODEL

2.1    Generation of orthogonal curvilinear grids

Generating a grid in an arbitrary physical domain involves a coordinate transformation from the physical plane (x, y) to the computational plane ( ) (see Fig.1). This is done here by solving a system of Poisson equation

                           (1a)

                           (1b)

where                  

and                      .

In Eq. (1), how to determine the functions of P and Q is often difficult. Wei Wen Li [11] has proposed a new method to determine them more efficiently with which a desired boundary-fitted curvilinear coordinate grid can be automatically generated. The details of the method are referred to Ref.[11]. The expressions of the functions P and Q are given below:

                            (2a)

                            (2b)

where      

Now considering the functions P and Q in (2), and solving Eq.(1),we can generate a boundary-fitted orthogonal curvilinear system. Eq.(1) are rewritten in finite difference scheme and then solved by the ADI method. If the points on the boundaries are unreasonably selected, the generated grids may be less orthogonal. Therefore, we make the points slip along the boundaries under the condition, . Further more, all subsequent hydrodynamic computations are performed in the coordinates( ).

2.2    Governing equations in transformed plane

The governing equations for turbulent flows are the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. In the equations, the Reynolds tress ( ) or turbulent stress appears. Therefore, additional equations are needed to solve the system of equations. The model, proposed by launder and Spalding (1972), is the widest applied two-equation turbulent closure model, and in the model, the Reynolds stresses have been modeled according to the Boussinesq assumption which relates the stresses to velocity gradients through a turbulent viscosity.

For two dimensional, time-averaged, incompressible turbulent flows, the governing equations can be written in orthogonal curvilinear coordinates in the following general form as

(3)

where U and V are the velocity components in the and directions, respectively;  represents any dependent variable of interest;  is the source term in the coordinate system; is the effective viscosity. If the conditions  and are satisfied, Eq. (3) represents the continuity equation. and  for each of the transport quantities (U, V, k, ) are as follows, respectively

 ( momentum equation)

    (4a)

                              (4b)

momentum equation)

    (5a)

                            (5b)

(k transportation equation)

                            (6a)

                            (6b)

( transportation equation)

                         (7a)

where and are gravity acceleration in and directions, respectively; and are empirical constants and have the values of 1.0,1.44,1.92,and 1.3, respectively; is the laminar viscosity;  the turbulent production term; the turbulent viscosity. The expressions of and are as follows, respectively

                (8)

                               (9)

where is the modeling constant in the turbulent viscosity formulation, and has the value of 0.09, as shown in Eq.(9).

As stated above, this is the standard two-equation model in an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system. The model can not predict complex turbulent flows. A few suggestions for modifying the model have been published, which aimed at the -equation. Launder and Sharma[7] selected a special form of the gradient Richardson number, involving a typical turbulence frequency to characterize the influence of the curvature:

                            (10)

where U is the velocity in the streamline direction, r is the radius of curvature of the streamline.

For the modified destruction term in the  equation, they proposed

                           (11)

and assigned a value of 0.20 to the constant . This modification gave good predications for data on a curved surface [7]. This basic idea has been adopted in this paper.

2.3    Discretization scheme

A staggered grid system is used where the control volumes for U and V are Centred on the faces of the control volumes for the scalar variables, and , the pressure nodes are located at the center of the continuity control volume, which is known to surpress the wiggles or the wiggles or the checkboard patterns of the pressure [10], as shown in Fig.1.

               

              (a) Physical plane                  (b) Transformed plane

Fig. 1    Control volume grid system

2.4    Boundary conditions

(1) Inlet plane: U, V, k and  are specified.

(2) Exit plane:  are satisfied.

(3) Body surface: Wall-functions are used for turbulent kinetic energy and its rate of dissipation ; and no slipping condition is used for velocity.

3    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The flow over a backward-facing step has been used to test the proposed model for the flow with local curvature effect. The computed region is shown in Fig.2.

Fig.2    Computed region

The comparision is made between the present model and the standard  model with 71×21 grid points. The flow prediction improvement by the present model is observed from the locus of flow reversal illustrated in Fig.3. The result indicates that the present model predicts later flow reattachment than does the standard model. It appears that the present model can account for the reduction of the eddy- viscosity by the effect of convex curvature on the primary flow as the flow separates from the step. The flow separation will also generate the effects of concave curvature on the secondary flow in the recirculation zone. The effect of the eddy – viscosity increase in the recirculation zone, thus, is much smaller than the effects of the eddy- viscosity reduction in the primary flow. Moreover, since there is no mechanism in the standard  model to simulate the curvature effects, the predicted convex shear layer exhibits a higher viscosity and earlier reatchment in the standard model.

measured;     ------s-k- computed;     ——c-k- computed

Fig.3    Comparision of locus of flow reversal between computed results and experimental data for different Re

4    CONCLUSIONS

Advantages of this proposed mathematical model are that the effects of streamline curvature to properties of turbulence flow is included and the orthogonal curvilinear coordinate grids are used to deal with the complicated computational region boundaries in the numerical simulation of complex turbulence flow. The computed examples show that this proposed model has good stability , convergence and accuracy; and this model will find more applications in hydraulic engineering.

References

[1]    Kreith, F., 1995: The influence of curvature on heat transfer to incompressible Fluids, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fiuids Engineering , Vol.77 No.11, PP.1247-1256.

[2]    Thomann, H., 1968: Effect of streamwise wall curvature heat Transfer in a Turbulent Boundary Layer, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol.33.Pt.2,PP.283-292.

[3]    Mayle, R.E.,Blair, M.F., and Kopper, F.C.,1979:Turbulent Boundary Layer heat Transfer on curved Surfaces , Journal of Hear Transfer, Vol.101,No.3, PP.515-523.

[4]    Wilcox, D.C. and Chambers, T.L., 1997: Streamline Curvature Effects on Turbulent Boundary layer, AIAA Journal, Vol.15, P.574-580.

[5]    Hah, C. and Lakshminarayana, B., 1980: The Prediction of two and Three-dimensional Asymmetric Turbulent Wakes-a Comparison of the Performance of Three Furbulence Models for the effects of Streamline Curvature and Rotation, AIAA Journal, Vol.16, No.11,P.1196.

[6]    Hah, C.and Lakshminarayana,B., 1980: Numerical Analysis of Three Dimensional Turbulent Wakes of Rotors in Acical-Flow Turbomachinery; J. Fluids Engineering, Vol.102,No.4, P.462-472.

[7]    Launder, B.E.,Pridden, C.H. and Sharma, B.I.,1997: The Calculation of Turbulent Boundary bayers on Spinning and Curved Surfaces, J.Fluid Eng., March 1977, P.231.

[8]    Pourahmadi, F. and Humphrey. J.A.C.,1983: Prediction of curved channel Flow with an Extended Model of Turbulence, AIAA Journal, Vol.21, No.10, P.1365.

[9]    Sharma, B.I.,1997: Computation of Flow Past a rotating Cylinder With an Energy-Dissipation Model of Turbulence, AIAA Journal, Vol.15, No.2, P.271-274.

[10]    Jin Zhong-qing, 1989: Numerical Solution to the Navier- Stokes Equations and Turbulence Models. Hohai University Publishing Cooperation. (in Chinese).

[11]    Wei Wen-li, PHD Thesis 1996: Study on Numerical solution For turbulent Flows on Concave Surfaces of Spillway Dams. (in Chinese).