ESTIMATED MEAN WATER RESIDENCE TIME (d 18O) OF KARSTIC SPRINGS AND KARST SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

 

TH. HEROLD, F. ZWAHLEN

CHYN, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland

 

S. M. BERNASCONI

Geology Institute, Swiss Federal Institut of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

 

P. JORDAN

Water Management Authority, Canton of Solothurn, Switzerland

 

Contact :

DR. THILO HEROLD

Centre d'Hydrogéologie, Université de Neuchâtel

Rue Emile-Argand 11

2007 Neuchâtel, Switzerland

thilo.herold@chyn.unine.ch

 

 

Abstract

The Weissenstein Anticline is located 100 km northwest of Bern, in the south-east part of the Folded Jura (Switzerland). The anticline contains two large aquifers, the Dogger limestone and the Malm limestone. The two aquifers are separated by impermeable layers. The anticline is hydrogeologically bounded by the Weissenstein-tunnel in the west and the Oensingen gorge in the east. Geometric modelling and the results of the multiple tracer experiments showed that pre- and synorogenic faults strongly influence the pattern and interconnection of karst systems.

During the folding of the anticline, the erosion started at preferential locations which were connected to preexisting fault systems. Thus we suspect a paleo-geomorphologic pattern which influenced the development of limestone fracture systems in present day karst systems.

 

To test this hypothesis, the largest karst springs in the Weissenstein Anticline were continuously measured for discharge, temperature and conductivity for several years. In addition, weekly samples of spring waters and the daily precipitation were measured for stable Isotpes (18O) to determine annual variations. As demonstrated in this paper, with the Malm karst spring database, it was possible to estimate, as the first step, the mean residence time of the spring water. The water from individual sampling points showed characteristic differences in residence time along the valley from east to west. Given the spring water residence times we believe that maturity of karstic features in the Weissenstein Anticline increases from east to west as a result of the structure's geological and paleo-geomorphological evolution.

 

Keywords: anticline, tectonic, stable Isotopes, karst springs, residence times, paleo-geomorphological evolution.

 

Introduction

The Jura fold belt developed by thin-skinned tectonic activity into an arc 390 km long and 250 km wide along the French-Swiss border. The upper part of the belt overlies a crystalline basement complex, which was brittly deformed during the Variscan orogeny. Late Palaeozoic sedimentation infilled troughs in the Basement (Diebold et al. 1991). Mesozoic and earliest Cainozoic sediments overlie the Permo-Carboniferous deposits. These later strata began to be folded in the late Miocene as a result of the Alpine orogeny (Laubscher 1961, 1972, 1985). The structure of the anticline, synclines as well as present day active karst systems were controlled by the reactivation of pre-existing WSW-ENE trending Late Paleozoic structures and NNE-SSW trending early Tertiary structures (Herold 1998).

 

Figure 1: Short tectonic history sketch of the study area and surrounding regions (strongly modified after Diebold et al. 1991).

 

Contemporaneous to the folding, erosion started at locations connected to the tectonic structures. In the course of time, a geomorphological pattern developed which had an increasing influence on the development of the karst systems.

 

A part of the Folded Jura was selected for additional karst hydrogeological investigations since existing studies have already defined geological structures in the area (Bitterli, 1990; Laubscher & Hauber 1982; Meier 1977; Thyry et al., 1994).

 

The area investigated is called the Weissenstein Anticline. The anticline is 22 km long by 8 km wide. The western part of the anticline is hydrogeologically bounded by the Weissenstein-tunnel, and the eastern part by the Oensingen gorge.

Data collection

Quarterly groundwater monitoring for 18O in spring water began in autumn 1993. Since 1996 the samples have been collected weekly.

Starting from 1995 daily precipitation was monitored for 18O. Two additional stations were added to the precipitation network at the start of 1996.

 

The 18O analyses were carried out at the Stable Isotope Laboratory of the Geological Institute ETH-Zürich. The 18O values are expressed with reference to the Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW) in units of parts per thousands (per mil).

 

methods

Lumped-parameter flow models are analytical, steady state and one-dimensional concepts describing the transformation of a given tracer input (concentration in precipitation or air Cin) into the tracer output (concentration at an outflow site Cout) within a continuous flow system (Maloszewski and Zuber, 1982; Amin and Campana, 1996). For environmental isotopes such as tracers, this expression takes form of a convolution integral with a system response function thereby giving the expected residence time distribution:

Cout (t) = Cin (t-T) g(T) exp (-lT) dT

where

g(T) = Characterization of the type of water mixing, or the model concept itself

t = chronological time

T = residence time

l = decay rate for radioactive isotopes

 

Different flow systems exist in karst regions. As Rank et al. (1992) demonstrated for a karstic region in an alpine karst massif, slow tracer transport through a fissured-porous system can be described by the dispersion model. For fast tracer transport through the direct flow path in the drainage channels, between sink holes and springs, the piston flow model can be used.

 

For mean residence time modeling of karst spring water in the study area, Maloszewki's and Zuber's, 1996, two-parameter exponential/piston-flow model was used. The daily local 18O rainfall record has been calculated into a monthly weightened rainfall quantity record. Precipitation values below 4 mm/d were not considered. Furthermore this record was completed for the period January 1990 until March 1995 using monthly values from IAEA/WMO station in Bern.

 

mean residence time of karst springs

18O levels in the Hun spring, which is located at the upper end of Oensingen gorge (fig. 4), fluctuate annually between 1996 and 1997 (fig. 2). A curve of spring water 18O values can be modeled and fit to the observed data (fig. 3). 18O results suggest that the mean spring water residence time is approx. 20 months.

The Chaltbrunnen spring is located 5 km west of the Hun spring. The annual amplitude of the 18O variation is lower, which indicates a larger retention time compared to the Hun spring. As shown in figure 3, the modeling could be adapted for the winter 96/97 and 97/98. It indicates an age of approx. 40 months for the mean water residence time. For winter 95/96 an adjustment was not possible. 18O values suggest that different processes operate at Chaltbrunnen spring. For better model calibration, better weighting of the inputs (precipitation) would have to be applied and considered with respect to the geological setting.

 

 

Figure 2: Annual variation of 18O values of the most important springs in the Malm limestone.

 

 

Figure 3: Mean water residence time calculations (curves) fit to measured 18O spring water values.

 

The Hammer spring, 5 km west of Chaltbrunnen spring, shows no significant change in 18O content between 1995 and 1997. Consequently, modelling of the mean residence time using 18O is not possible. Compared with the other two springs, the Hammer spring has a longer mean water residence time.

 

GEological structures and paleo-geomorphology

In the study area the tectonic history plays a key factor in establishing the location, direction and extension of the karst drainage system (Herold 1998). As shown in figure 4, the largest springs along the hillside of the Weissenstein-anticline are always connected to NNE-SSW striking thrust zones. These thrust zones even connect deep karst systems in the core of the anticline to the limbs, cutting through thick impermeable layers.

 

 

Figure 4: Schematic view of the Weissentein-anticline with the three most important springs in the Malm limestone and preferential drainage as well as erosion direction (grey arrow).

 

In addition to the tectonic controls, another important factor for karst development is the paleo-geomorphological evolution. During the folding of the Jura Mountains, erosion started at preferential locations leading to the stepwise development of the present gorges (e.g. Oensingen gorge) which orthogonally crosses the anticlines. These gorges control surface water drainage, which flows from the Jura Mountains into the Mittelland. This evolution influenced the genesis of the karst systems, which migrated from east (Oensingen gorge) to west, parallel to the northern side of the Weissenstein-anticline.

 

Conclusions

Our data indicate that because the erosion started in the Gorge of Oensingen and progressed parallel to the anticline to the west, the fault network connected to the Gorge was the first to be drained. The flowing water enlarged the preexisting network of fractures. For this reason, springs in this area have a low mean residence time (Hun spring).

As erosion propagated along the valley, the western fracture systems were progressively connected to the older part of the karst, and became drained by the flow system within the valley and the gorge. The last fracture system to be connected to the flow system includes the Hammer spring catchement. Because this was the last of the fracture systems influenced, less time was available for the karst system development. The water of this spring (Hammer spring) flows through a highly fractured, but poorly developed karst system, so that the highest mean residence times are observed at this location.

 

References

Amin, I. E. & Campana, M. E. (1996): A general lumped parameter model for the interpretation of tracer data and transit time calculation in hydrologic systemns. J. Hydrol. 179, 1-21.

Bitterli, Th. (1990): The kinematic evolution of a classical Jura fold: a reinterpretation based on 3-dimensional balancing techniques (Weissenstein Anticline, Jura Mountains, Switzerland). Eclogea geol. Helv. 83/3, 493-512.

Diebold, P. et al. (1991): Zur Tektonik der Nordschweiz; Nagra Techn. Bericht; NTB 90-04.

Herold, T. (1998): Grundwasser, Karstsysteme und tektonische Strukturen im Gebiet der Weissenstein- und Farisbergkette. Ph.D Thesis. Swiss Federal Institut of Technology, Zürich. AWW-Publikationen, Kantonales Amt für Wasserwirtschaft, Solothurn, Schweiz.

Laubscher, H. & Hauber, L. (1982): Querschnitt durch das Juragebirge zwischen Oensingen und Basel; Jber. Mitt. Oberrh. Geol. Ver. N.F. 64, 73-77.

Laubscher, H. (1961): Die Fernschubhypothese der Jurafaltung. Eclogae Helv. 54/1, 221-282.

Laubscher, H. (1972): Some Overall Aspects of Jura Dynamics; Amer. J. of Science 272, 293-304.

Laubscher, H. (1985): The Eastern Jura: Relations between thin-skinned and basement tectonics, local and regional; Nagra. Techn. Ber. NTB 85-53.

Maloszewski, P. & Zuber, A. (1982): Determing the tournover time of groundwater system with the aid of environmental tracers, 1. Models and their applicability. J. Hydrol. 57, 207-231.

Maloszewski, P. & Zuber, A. (1996): Manual on mathematical models in isotope hydrogeology. IAEA, Vienna 1996, pages 9-50.

Meier, B. (1977): Zur Geologie der Klus von Balsthal-Oensingen (Ostseite). Unveröff. Diplomarbeit Univ. Basel.

Rank, D., Völk, G., Maloszewski, P. and Stichler, W. (1992): Flow dynamics in an alpine karst massif studied by means of environmental isotopes. Isotope techniques in water resources development (Proc. of the Vienna Symposium, March 1991), pages 327-343. International Atomy Agency, Vienna.

Thyry, M., Gautschi, A., Mazurek, M., Müller, W., Naef, H., Pearson, F., Vomvoris, S., Wilson, W. (1994): Geology and Hydrogeology of the Crystalline Basement of Northern Switzerland, Synthesis of Regional Investigations 1981 - 1993. NAGRA Technischer Bericht 93-01.