ANALYSIS OF WATER HAMMER BASED ON NETWORK THEORY

 

K.FUJINO

 

Electric Power Development Co. Ltd. 6-15-1 Ginza, Chuo-Ku,

Tokyo 104-8165, Japan

Phone : +81-3-3546-2211; Fax : +81-3-3544-1385; E-mail : fujino@epdc.co.jp

 

N.TAMAI

University of Tokyo 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Phone : +81-3-5841-6105; Fax : +81-3-5841-6130;

E-mail : tamai@hydra.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

 

 

ABSTRACT

In hydropower projects, it is very popular to investigate several alternatives of waterway at a design stage, in point of not only alignment but also connectivity of conduits, number of wye branches and turbines. However, there are few satisfactory methods to analyze transient hydraulic phenomena such as surging and water hammer for arbitrary waterways. In this paper, a method based on a network theory is proposed to analyze such hydraulic phenomena, and its validity is proven by comparison with real data obtained at a pumped storage power station in service.

 

INTRODUCTION

Generally a waterway system may have plural intakes, surgetanks, wye branches and power units. They are optimized at a design stage in point of construction cost, operation and maintenance, including an alignment of waterways. However degree of freedom in choice of alternative layouts is often restricted due to limited functions of computer codes to analyze transient hydraulic phenomena such as surging and water hammer. In order to resolve limitation described above, authors applied a network theory to generalize an arbitrary waterway system in the water hammer analysis. Generally a waterway is decomposed into elements such as reservoirs, unit conduits, surgetanks, branches and power units from viewpoint of function. A network theory can formulate transient hydraulic phenomena of entire waterway system by composing simultaneous linear equations that express characteristics of waterway units and boundary conditions.

 

EXPRESSION OF WATER HAMMER BY A NETWORK MODEL

 

Concept of Network

When a set of lines {Bk} (k=1..K) and a set of nodes {Na} (a=1..A) exist, if an incidence function [Bk:Na], which expresses incidence relationship between lines and nodes, is defined, the entirety of two sets and the incidence relationship is called a "linear graph". Value of [Bk:Na] is as follows:

 

If Na is the initial point of Bk,

If Na is the terminal point of Bk,

If Na is neither initial nor terminal point of Bk,

[Bk:Na] = 1

[Bk:Na] = - 1

[Bk:Na] = 0


 

(1)

 

 

 

When some physical quantities are given to the lines or nodes of a linear graph, the linear graph is called a "network". Therefore, water hammer in a unit pipe of Fig.1 is a network, which is composed of {Bk} (k=1), {Na} (a=1,2), [Bk:Na] (=1 or -1), and physical quantities H(t) (head) and QU(t) (flow discharge), given at two nodes.

 

Arbitrary Waterway System of a Pumped Storage

Transient phenomenon of a conduit network is determined by obtaining the value of head and discharge at every end point of component conduits at each time. A conduit network of a pumped storage station is composed of an upper reservoir, surgetanks, pump-turbines, a lower reservoir, and pressurized conduits connecting them. In a conduit network containing these components, equations of water hammer and continuity of head and discharge are obtained as follows.

 

Basic Equation of Water Hammer

In a conduit shown in Fig.1, upstream end is named "1", downstream end is "2". Distance between 1 and 2 is "L", and a sectional area of the conduit is "a". When head, flow velocity and velocity of pressure wave in a conduit are written as "H", "V" and "c" respectively, basic equations of water hammer are as follows:

 

H1(t) - SQ1(t) = H2(t-L/c) - SQ2(t-L/c) (2)

H2(t) + SQ2(t) = H1(t-L/c) + SQ1(t-L/c) (3)

, where

 

Fig.1 : Water Hammer in a Conduit

 

When the coefficient of total head loss between nodes 1 and 2 is written "R", considering the direction of the flow, equations (2) and (3) are modified as follows.

 

As shown in eqs.(4) and (5), if H and Q are known at certain time and point in the pipe, H and Q in an interval L and at time (L/c) later are determined. The right-hand sides of (4) and (5) are thereafter written "C1,2(t-L/c)" and "C2,1(t-L/c)", respectively:

 

H1(t) - SQ1(t) = H2(t-L/c) - SQ2(t-L/c) + R ´ Q2(t-L/c) 1/2Q2(t-L/c) 1/2 (4)

H2(t) + SQ2(t) = H1(t-L/c) + SQ1(t-L/c) - R ´ Q2(t-Dt) 1/2Q2(t-Dt) 1/2 (5)

 

, where Dt shows the time interval for actual calculation.

 

Equations of continuity of head and discharge

Total numbers of unit pipes and nodes of a conduit network are K and A, respectively. When one end of the k-th pipe Bk (k= 1,..,K) is the a-th node Na (a= 1,..,A), head and discharge at this end is written Hk,a(t), Qk,a(t) respectively. Using these notation, equations of continuity of head and discharge are written as follows.

 

Type 1. Continuity of head at the ends of unit pipes converging at one node (Fig.2)

 

[Bki:Na] Hki,a(t) + [Bkj:Na] Hkj,a(t) = 0 (6)

 

, where ki and kj are numbers of two among the unit pipes converging at node Na.

 

Type 2. Continuity of head in open water surface (Figs. 3 and 4)

 

Hk,a(t) - HR = 0 (Reservoir) (7)

 

, where HR (constant) is static pressure head at the intake or outlet.

 

Hk,a(t) - = 0 (Surgetank) (8)

 

Reflection of the pressure wave is assumed to occur in Na, bottom of the tank, so that L may be constant.

 

Type 3. Continuity of discharge in a node and a pump-turbine (Fig.2 and 5)

 

kn

å[Bk:Na]Qk,a(t) = 0 (Conversion of Unit Pipes) (9)

k=k1

 

, where k1 through kn are number of unit pipes converging at node Na.

 

[Bki:Nai]Qki,ai(t) = [Bkj:Naj]Qkj,aj(t) = 0 (Pump-Turbine in stoppage) (10)

[Bki:Nai]Qki,ai(t) + [Bkj:Naj]Qkj,aj(t) = 0 (Pump-Turbine in operation) (11)

 

, where ki and kj are numbers of unit pipes connected to entrance and outlet of a

pump-turbine.

 

 

 

Fig.2 : Conversion of Unit Pipes

Fig.3 : Reservoir

 

 

 

 

Fig.4 : Surgetank

Fig.5 : Pump-Turbine

 

RELATIONSHIP between Discharge and Head in Pump-Turbines

A linear equation (12) is derived for the pump-turbine in operation.

 

(12)

 

Equation (12) expresses the relationship between head at the entrance and outlet of a pump-turbine and discharge passing it. Its detail is explained in section 3.

 

EXPRESSION of Water Hammer by a Network Model

Total number of the equations of continuity is 2K. Combining with the basic equation of water hammer, of which number is also 2K, simultaneous equations (13) are obtained. Hence S, H and C denote a coefficient matrix, a variable vector and a constant vector respectively. As shown in eq. (13), vector H is composed only of quantities at time t, vector C is of quantities at time t-Dt, and matrix S does not contain any element of H and S. Therefore eq. (13) is a linear network model, H is calculated as follows.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13)

 

H = S-1 x C (14)

 

Equation (14) means that, if condition of transient phenomenon at time t-Dt is known, condition at time t is calculated from it. Initial condition (at t=0) is always determined by a calculation method such as Hardy Cross Method. Therefore, a network model determines a transient phenomenon of an arbitrary conduit network.

 

DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTER CODE

Based on the method explained above, the authors developed a computer code for analysis of transient phenomenon in arbitrary conduit system. In this code, a routine for linearization of head-discharge characteristics of pump-turbines in every time interval Dt is important. Its structure is as follows. Similarity law of pump-turbine is expressed by equations (15) through (17).

 

(15) (16) (17)

 

, where n(t), N(t); q(t), Q(t); t (t), T(t) are rotational speed, discharge and torque of model and real turbine, respectively. H(t) is head difference between entrance and outlet of the real turbine. M is scale of the model. Guide vane opening f(t) is known at any time. In the pump-turbine of Fig.5, if Qki,ai(t-Dt) is known, model flow q(t-Dt) is obtained from (16). By the n-q diagram (Fig.6-A), model rotational speed n(t-Dt) and locally linearized equation (18) is obtained. As Dt is small, (19) is assumed to be valid. From (15), (16) and (19), (20) is obtained. Linearizing (20), (12) is obtained. In equation (12), y and Z is expressed by (21) and (22) respectively.

 

(18)

 

(19)

 

(20)

 

(21)

 

(22)

 

As Z contains N(t), it must be determined. From the value n(t-Dt) and n-t diagram (Fig.6-B), model torque t(t-Dt) is determined. T(t-Dt) and N(t) are determined by (17) and (23), respectively, where I is inertia moment of rotating part.

 

(23)

 

SIMULATION OF THE OBSERVED PERFORMANCE

 

Conduit System of Okukiyotsu No.2 Power Station and its Modelling

Okukiyotsu No.2 Power Station is a pumped storage owned by EPDC in Japan. Maximum discharge, standard effective head, installed capacity are 154m3/s, 470m, 600MW (2 units @300MW), respectively. The profile and typical cross sections of the conduit are shown in Fig.7. The conduit is single, but the upstream and downstream parts of two pump-turbines are bifurcated. Two surge tanks are equipped in upstream end of the penstock and downstream of the bifurcation of tailrace tunnel, respectively. Calculation model of this conduit system is shown in Fig.8.

 

 

Fig.6 : Pump-Turbine Characteristics and Determination of Pump-Turbine Condition

 

 

Fig.7 : Profile and Cross Sections of the Conduit System

 

Comparison of Observed and Calculated Water Hammer

During the test operation of Okukiyotsu No.2 Pumped Storage from 1995 to 1996, water hammer was observed just upstream and downstream of the pump-turbines.

Figs.9-A and 9-C show the pressure change for a full load rejection observed just upstream and downstream of the pump-turbine No.1 respectively. Figs.9-B and 9-D also show the pressure change calculated under the same conditions as in the observation, such as guide vane closing mode f(t), reservoir water level etc. This computer code simulates the actual pressure change well.

 

 

Fig.8 : Calculation Model

 

 

 

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

 

D

 

Fig.9 : Observed and Calculated Water Hammer

 

Conclusion

Transient hydraulic phenomenon in arbitrary conduit system can be analyzed universally by a network model. A computer code for this model was developed. The calculated predicted output of the model agreed well with observation.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr. Yoshihisa Kawahara of the Public Works Research Institute of the Ministry of Construction for suggestions on the computer code.

 

REFERENCE

CHACHRA,V., GHARE,P.M., MOORE,J.M. Applications of Graph Theory Algorithms. New York, Elsevier North Holland, 1979, 421p. ( ISBN 0-444-00268-5 )