|
|
Identification
of the Greater Baku wastewater systems on hydraulic modelling basis using GIS
Dr.I.Mamedzadeh, S.Nimer
Montgomery Watson / Azspetsprominvest Consulting
Engineering Co.
54 Bulbul Avenue, Baku City, Azerbaijan, 370014
phone : (99412) 957056; fax :
(99412) 951247; e-mail : ats@aspi.baku.az
Abstract
For Baku city (capital of Azerbaijan) with a population of
some 1.9 million an enormous wastewaters are evident in the discrepancy between
the volume potentially available and
the actual quautity of water received
by users.
In Apsheron peninsula as the
larger urban area one third of the population is not connected to a
municipal wastewater system. All of the
Greater Baku urban centers have inadequate sewerage and lack treatment facilities.
Large number of different sewerage systems together with new settlement are creating a difficulties for effective
monitoring of wastewater collection and treatment.
The study area, Apsheron
peninsula, consists of wastewater connected and non-connected to the collection
system, treated or untreated primarily to the Caspian Sea, inter- connections
with the stormwater drainage system, pass directly to storage Bulbul and
GunliGel lakes. Due to this complexity it is unable to study individual
discharge points and some parameters such us capacity, leakage and
infiltration, pumped flows, wastewater loads, within short period without to
use modelling methods.
In this context relevant
wastewater features have been hydraulic analysed to extract spatial parameters related wastewater production and
the extrated parameters are used input for GIS to obtain different wastewater
needs.
Keywords: wastewater, sewerage,
modelling, CCTV survey, classification, assessment
Introduction
Greater baku with area about is 2192 km2 situated to
western part of the caspian Sea.
At present, more than 70% of industrial potential of Azerbaijan is concentrated
in the Apsheron peninsula, mostly in two big cities - Baku and Sumgait.
The population presently connected
to the collection system is about 78% of population of Apsheron peninsula. The
total wastewater is reported to be nearly 1.3 million m3/day, as the capacity
of operational treatment plants is only 0.95 million m3/day.
A main objective of this study is
to use approach the hydraulic modelling for assessment the existing physical
condition of the various wastewater system components and expend the system to
meet present and future wastewater needs. In this context an attempt has been
made adopt a new methodology called Hydroworks, developed by «Wallingford
Procedure» for determination of hydraulic capacity of the wastewater collection
system.
Current
Situation
The wastewater systems serving the
Greater Baku area comprise some 1100 km of
trunk, collector and local sewers,
22 pumping stations, 100 km of pressure mains and five wastewater treatment
plants.
The Baku City has a number of
treatment facilities, mainly for the treatment of domestic sewage in the volume
of 317 million m3 (Hovsan biological treatment facilities with a
capacity of 600,000 m3/day and with a project capacity of 940,000 m3/day; Haji
Hasan mechanical treatment
facilities - 18,600 m3/day; Shuvalan
mechanical treatment facilities -
18,600 m3/day ; Zikh mechanical
treatment facilities - 126,000 m3/day; Karadag biological treatment
facilities - 17,600 m3/day; Khatai mechanical facilities with total capacity
258,400 m3/day). The construction of the Greater Baku sewerage system was
started in the 1970's, was planned to be finished in 1980.
However, so far it operates at 60
% of the capacity. Provision of a sewerage system for half of the settlements
and districts of Baku has not yet been completed.
About 400,000 m3 of untreated wastewater is discharged primarily to the
Caspian Sea through by passes or inter-connections with the stormwater drainage
system. Some flows pass directly to Apsheron lakes, which are periodically
pumped into the wastewater collection system as constantly rising levels have
led to flooding nearly of properties.
Field Survey
In order planned investigations to
expand the sewerage systems it is essential that the existing facilities are
analysed to assess: size, level, capacity and performance; structural condition
and residual life; service condition including siltation, internal surface
encrustation and blockages; adequacy, serviceability and performance of
mechanical and electrical equipment.
The physical conditions of the
Baku wastewater collection system has been investigated by conducting a Closed
Circuit Television (CCTV) survey of a number of representative sample sewers.
The survey provided information on the internal surface and structural
condition of a selection of sewer pipe materials, integrity of pipeline joints,
vertical/horizontal displacements, blockages and sediment depths, levels of
infiltration or inflow. The 381 surveys (survey is two or more length of sewer
surveyed in a continuous operation, while sewer length is the distance between
pipe-end faces in consecutive manholes) represent 17,522 m of pipelines, the
actual length of surveyed pipe is 13,685 m. For classification of the internal
pipe condition were defined five following grades : (1) Acceptable structural
condition; (2) Minimal collapse risk in the short terms, but potential for
further deterioration; (3) Collapse unlikely in the near future, but further
deterioration likely; (4) Collapse likely in the foreseeable future; (5)
Collapsed or collapse imminent.
Below is a summary table of
results of the CCTV survey
|
Internal Condition Grade |
Number of Surveys |
Total Length of Pipelines (m) |
Surveyed Length of Pipelines (m) |
|
Grade 5 |
4 |
212 |
212 |
|
Grade 4 |
192 |
9664 |
8642 |
|
Grade 3 |
41 |
1452 |
1062 |
|
Grade 1 or 2 |
144 |
6194 |
3769 |
|
Total |
381 |
17522 |
13685 |
There are four pipe materials in
the network. The correlation between pipe materials and internal condition is
summarised below. The percentage of pipelines with an internal condition grade
of 4 or 5 is shown for each material.
|
Material |
Number of Surveys |
Total Length of Pipelines (m) |
% of Pipes with ICG 4 or 5 |
|
Asbestos Cement |
149 |
7290 |
54% |
|
Concrete |
187 |
8169 |
53% |
|
Cast Iron |
38 |
1779 |
29% |
|
Brick |
7 |
284 |
57% |
Hydraulic
Modelling and Analysis
In evaluating a wastewater
collection system one of the most important aspects to be considered is the
hydraulic carrying capacity of the system. This determines the adequacy of each
length of sewer to be able to convey present and projected future flow rates.
To carry out the hydraulic analysis, current sewer data together with present
and future flow rates were built into a computerised hydraulic model. The model
was then used to determine the flow characteristics of the sewer, i.e. whether
flowing partially full or surcharged and to relate projected wastewater flow
rates to the carrying capacity of the receiving sewer and trunk lines based on
their size, roughness, slope and depth of sediment.
To determine the hydraulic
capacity of the wastewater collection system, an hydraulic model called
Hydrowork was used. Hydrowork Model is a commercial software designed specially
for the hydraulic analysis of wastewater and drainage systems. To simplify the
analysis of the existing collectors and trunks and to allow the projected
growth that will occur within the immediate vicinity of Baku to be incorporated
more readily into the analysis. For determination of the projected wastewater
flow rates the centre of the Baku City, and the portions of the districts that
are discharging by gravity, and /or pumping to the Hovsan and Zykh treatment
plants have been divided of spatial parameters on average wastewater flow, type
of sewers and collection systems, drainage network capacity, infiltration
rates, population and industrial density. The final map including surficial
features, mentioned above has been spatial parameters and table digitized in
order to carry out further analysis by used GIS. As shown in figure1, the eight
(8) drainage sub-areas with homogeneous wastewater parameters were identified.
These sub-areas selected as spatial base for application of the Hydrowork
Model. The projected wastewater production for the 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015
were provided data on average daily
wastewater flows, infiltration for each sub-areas, also determined data on
population projections, peaking factors, total peak wastewater flow.
In order to determine the adequacy
of the existing trunk sewer system, peak flows for year 1996, i.e. the existing
condition with different scenarios, were simulated. In addition, the projected
peak flow rates for the future were compared to the capacity of the system. The
modelled system was upgraded to eliminate all flooding and significant
surcharging. The simulation and comparison of the main sewer pipelines were
carried out for the following separate conditions.
1 Scenario - simulation of
existing conditions. The sewered areas are partially connected to stormwater
systems and discharge untreated wastewater
to the Caspian Sea, the estimated wastewater flow rate used is 527
l/c/d. Widespread flooding and surcharging is predicted to occur throughout the
system. Main problem areas are 8km Collector, upstream section of the Circular
Collector, Collector A at upstream Karadag system, inadequacy capacity at
Pumping Station #4.
2 Scenario as 1 Scenario with all
silt removed. Main problem areas are as for 1 Scenario, but less severe, and
more flow can reach Hovsan treatment plant.
3 Scenario where all areas are
connected to the wastewater system, using the same flows and infiltration as 1
Scenario, lake pumping terminated. Main problem areas are 8rv Collector
downstream Pumping Station #3, upstream section of Circular Collector,
Collector A, upstream section of Gravity Collector.
4 Scenario as 3 Scenario with
upgrades for 2005 year flow. Total wastewater production is 855,000 m3/day, all
reaching Hovsan treatment plant. Abandon Zykh wastewater treatment plant and connected
to Pumping Station#2; upgrade system as required to minimise surcharging and
eliminate flooding; new collector to take area at upstream end of Circular
Collect directly to Karadag Collector.
Some localised surcharging remains
as follows 8km Collector downstream Pumping Station #3 and short section of
Circular Collector.
Flows are projected to fall after
the year 2000, because it is assumed that the per capita water consumption
rates will be reduced and that the rate of infiltration will be less, due to
implementation of emergency short term measures.
Conclusions
The study on hydraulic modelling
base was a qualitative and subjective nature and provided a real alternative to
the traditional methods such as map overlays. Remote sensing technique are
useful in extraction of spatial data and GIS is useful in handling spatial data
efficiency. The following seemed to be representative observations :
·
The sewers appear to be in a general state of decline across
the catchment due to hydrogen sulphide attack. The rate of decline and degree
of degradation to date however varies spatially across the catchment, due to a
combination of flow levels, flow rates, flow turbidity, toxicity of the sewer
itself and the location of the sewer in the catchment. The proximity and nature
of any industrial discharges could also have an effect on the degree of
degradation of the sewer.
·
The degree of degradation varies from either being visible
along the entire length of a survey, or, where attack is less advanced,
deterioration is only visible at the more vulnerable areas, such as joints. In
some cases holes, and broken and displaced joints are visible.
·
Flows within the catchment appear to of a fairly high level
with velocities and often turbulent in nature. Such conditions will tend to
exacerbate and accelerate any deterioration within the sewer. This is
particular problem where retention times are long enough to enable the sewage
to turn septic.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge
the technical support and advice given by Mr. R. E. Dyce, Dr. A. V. Gray, Dr.
F. Guliyev, Mr. E. Yusifov during this study period.
References
1. Chambers
P., Walker S., Jefferson C. (1997) Impacts of municipal wastewater effluents on
Canadian waters: a review. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada. 32:659-713.
2. ARWC.
(1998). Water and wastewater Master Plan for Greater Baku. Vol.4.
3. UNDP.
Azerbaijan: state of the environment report. pp:37-42.
4. Jensen K. (1998). Environmental impact assessment
using the rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM). Olsen&Olsen, VKI, Fredensborg, Denmark, pp:8-28.
5. Brown S.,
Engel B. (1993). Comparison of GIS assisted simulated hydrologic response with
actual storm event data. In: Advances in hydro-science and engineering, Vol.1,
pp:511-517.
6. Mamedzadeh
I. (1998). Water situation in Azerbaijan Republic: problems, future scenarios
and recommendations. In: Proc. Of International Conference on World water
resources at the beginning og the 21st Century, IHP-V, Technical
documents in hydrology, No.18, UNESCO, Paris, pp:465-471.
