|
|
Shear stress statistics in a turbulent, open-channel flow over a
rough bed
D. HURTHER and U. LEMMIN
Laboratoire de Recherches Hydrauliques
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
tel: +41 21 693 2400 fax: + 41 21 693 6767 e-mail: david.hurther@epfl.ch
3D quasi-instantaneous velocity profiles are taken at the
center of a uniform, turbulent, open-channel flow over a rough bed. A cumulant
discard method is applied to describe the statistical properties of the covariance
terms
and
relative to their
time means. Conditional statistics and conditional sampling are used to compare
the theoretical and experimental relative shear stress contributions from
quadrants in the longitudinal and transverse planes. The results in the
section show the
presence of outward interactions (quadrant I), ejections (quadrant II), inward
interactions (quadrant III) and sweeps (quadrant IV) with dominance in quadrant
II and IV. The transverse quadrant distribution of fractional
events is
characterized by a quasi uniform repartition over the transverse plane. A
simple linear relation between the third order cumulants of the two probability
densities leads to an expression for the turbulent kinetic energy flux
indicating its strong dependence on the bursting process. Finally the positive
and negative contributions to the stress production are compared with the
transport term evaluated from the third order moment of
.
Keywords: shear stress dynamics, conditional statistics, conditional sampling, coherent structures, turbulent energy budget.
Coherent structures in a uniform open-channel flow over
smooth or rough bed have been studied by many authors . The importance of these
near wall burst events in the generation of shear stress over the whole water
depth has been demonstrated quantitatively (Grass
1971). Recently, experimental studies of Séchet (1996), Cellino
(1998) and Rashidi
et al. (1990) have provided information about the correlation
between the occurrence of coherent structures and the sediment transport
mechanism in the cases of bedload transport and suspension flow. Few studies
exist in the field of mixing of matter which consider quantitatively the
influence of these events on the turbulent diffusivity depending only on the
local statistical properties of the turbulent flow. Therefore, in order to
improve estimates of these turbulence depending quantities more experimental
studies are needed to determine their statistical characteristics made possible
by new instrument. This paper reports on an experimental investigation of the
conditionally sampled covariance events
and
in open-channel flow.
The statistical parameters evaluated from the experimental results will be
compared to those estimated by a cumulant discard Gram-Charlier distribution of
third order also used by Nakagawa
and Nezu (1977; hereinafter NN77). Also, a relationship between the turbulent kinetic
energy diffusion term and an ejection-sweep parameter will be given without
making additional assumptions for the
term of the 2D mean
flow turbulent energy equation.
Experiments were carried out in a laboratory open-channel
(29m long, 2.45m wide) under uniform flow conditions with a sand bed (mean
grain size 1.7mm). The measurement section is placed 13m downstream from the
entrance where turbulent flow is well developed. All velocity data presented
here were taken at the center of the channel. The hydraulic parameters are given
in table 1. These indicate a subcritical turbulent flow. The variables u* u*,S and
u*,log
represent the friction velocities obtained from linear extrapolation of the
mean Reynolds stress at the wall, from the energy line slope formula for
uniform flow and from the log law, respectively. The dimensionless roughness
value
shows an incompletely rough bed. The P parameter in
table 1 represents the P factor of Coles wake function.
An Acoustic Doppler Velocity Profiler (ADVP) is used to evaluate the three instantaneous velocity components over the entire water depth. In order to maintain a constant acoustical beamwidth over the whole water depth we use a concentric annular phase array emitter which reduces the sample volume size to p42´3mm3. Details of this technique are described in Hurther et al. (1998). The temporal resolution is fixed at 31.25 velocity profiles per second. The experiments were conducted in clear water conditions in which the ultrasonic targets are concentration microstructures originating from fine air bubbles following the turbulent motion without inertial lag over the investigated frequency band (Shen et al. 1997).
We define the variables as follows:
are the zero mean
fluctuating longitudinal, transverse and vertical velocity components
respectively.
are equal to
. We shall quantify the contributions from the different
planes of the relative shear stress for the covariance terms
and
. Fig. 1 shows the orientations of the quadrants in the
longitudinal and transverse planes. Two characteristic functions
and
, expressed as the Fourier transforms of the joint
probability density functions
and
respectively, can be
expressed as function of the moment and cumulant generating functions in which
and
denote the moments of
(j+k)th order and
and
correspond to the
cumulants of (j+k)th order. NN77 expressed the conditionally sampled probability
densities over the four quadrants of covariance event
. The mathematical manipulation is completely described in NN77. The following equations are given:
(1)
where the index q in pi,q
denotes the quadrant index in the ith plane with planes 1 and 2
corresponding to the longitudinal and transverse planes respectively. The
probability density
is directly developed
from the corresponding bivariate normal distribution. The non-conditionally
sampled probability function of shear stress is
with
and:
(2)
where,
are the corresponding
correlation coefficients and
is the 0-th order
modified Bessel function of the second kind. The physical meaning of the
coefficients
and
will be discussed
later. From equations (1) we will calculate the first order moment of each
conditional probability density distribution as function of the threshold
levels
. Increasing the level allows the selection of strong
fractional Reynolds stress events. Their directional distribution over the
different quadrants in the longitudinal and transverse sections can be
investigated using the following expressions
with
and
with
. This method is known as the u-w quadrant threshold
technique. The parameters
, evaluated from the probability densities will be compared
to the ones from experimental results in order to give new information about
the quadrant distribution of the relative covariance term
in the transverse
section of the flow.
Fig. 2 represents all third order moments needed to evaluate
the factors
and
of the quadrant
probability density functions
. In our case a linear combination of these third order
moments yields
. From this relation we can express the
factors in eq. (2) as
function of one third order moment and calculate the quadrant probability
densities. The last relation shows the importance of the third order moment (or
cumulant) when covariance dynamics of
events is
investigated.
Fig. 3 presents the theoretical and experimental quadrant
fractional contributions of the relative covariance term
calculated from
equations (2) and from the
-quadrant technique, respectively. Comparison of the results
at four different depths are shown denoting the well-known ejection-sweep
dominance in
contribution. In the
outer flow region (z/h>0.2) the ejection contribution is higher than the one
originating from sweeps but in the inner region the sweep contribution
increases and reaches the same level as the quadrant II contribution. That
phenomena was also found by Grass
(1971) who stated that sweep events become larger in the
vicinity of the wall. In Fig. 4 we can observe the same quantities as in Fig. 3
but for the shear stress events
, i.e. the distribution in the transverse section of the
flow. It can be seen that the curves fall off more slowly stretching to much
larger values of the threshold level
denoting larger
variations from their
temporal mean and low mean covariance
. It is particularly striking that the contribution to the
shear stress
generation is nearly the same for all four quadrants, independent of the
threshold level
and depth z/h.
The dimensionless turbulent kinetic energy flux is written
as
, which is extracted from the simplified form of the
turbulent energy equation for a uniform, incompressible 2D mean flow. NN77 derived this term as:
with
. This equation indicates the direct relation between the
turbulent energy flow budget and the bursting process through the third order
moments
and
. If we assume that a linear combination between the four
third order moments is valid (see above), Fk
can be written as
with
. The ci,jk
coefficients are extracted from the linear combination and the coefficients Ci are extracted from the
universal semi-empirical relations of the turbulence intensities given by Nezu
et al. (1986). In Fig. 5, the Fk
profiles estimated by the three last relations are plotted. All curves agree
well among themselves except in the inner flow region. The last equation of Fk has the advantage that it
requires the knowledge of only one instantaneous velocity component in
comparison with the relation proposed by NN77 in which the crossed third order moments are
estimated from 2D instantaneous velocities measurements. We found S@ -0.15 from our experimental
investigations.
As mentioned above the equation for the Fk term clearly shows the connection of the turbulent energy budget to the bursting phenomena. The effect of roughness can be identified if the data are compared to those measured by NN77. It is characterized by a rapid decrease of Fk towards the wall, becoming negative for z/h<0.2. In that case the inner region is marked by a downward turbulent energy flux. NN77 showed that this tendency increases with roughness which implies an increase of the turbulent energy flux gradient with roughness and thus an increase of the local energy loss with roughness size. In Fig. 6 the dimensionless turbulent diffusion term (one plot) and production terms (three plots) are represented. The observed distribution over depth of the diffusion term corresponds well with the tendency of the curves in Fig. 5. The three remaining curves in Fig. 6 show the positive, negative and total stress production terms of the turbulent energy equation represented respectively by the contributions of the quadrant two and quadrant four events, the quadrant one and three events and the summation of the last two events. It is noted that a positive production term implies an energy transfer from the mean to the turbulent flow and vice versa. In our case, the total production is positive over the entire flow depth with a maximum value of 14 at z/h=0.09. For 0.1<z/h<0.6 the positive term remains considerably higher than the negative one but in the free surface flow region the two terms are almost of the same magnitude. It should be remembered that the last two points of the profile near the surface were omitted due to the presence of the transducer chamber. In that region an energy transfer to the mean flow could be envisioned.
Cellino, M. (1998). "Experimental study of suspension flow in open channels." Doctoral dissertation n°1824. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, Lausanne.
Grass, A. J. (1971). "Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries." J. Fluid Mech. , 50(2), 233-255.
Hurther, D. and Lemmin, U. (1998). "A constant beamwidth transducer for 3D acoustic Doppler profile measurements in open channel flows." Meas. Sci. Technol. , 9(10), 1706-1714.
Nakagawa, H. and Nezu, I. (1977). "Prediction of the contribution to the Reynolds stress from bursting events in open-channel flows." J. Fluid Mech. , 80(1), 99-128.
Rashidi, M. et al. (1990). "Particle-turbulence interaction in a boundary layer." Int. J. Multiphase Flow , 6, 935-949.
Séchet, P. (1996). "Contribution à l'étude des structures cohérentes en turbulence de parois. De leur influence sur le transport des sédiments dans le cas du charriage." Doctoral dissertation n°1245. Institut National Polytechnique, Toulouse.
Shen, C. and Lemmin, U. (1997). "Ultrasonic scattering in highly turbulent clear water flow." Ultrasonics , 35, 57-64.
|
Q (m3/s) |
h (cm) |
U (cm/s) |
u* (cm/s) |
u*,S (cm/s) |
u*,log (cm/s) |
S (´10-4) |
Reh (´103) |
Frh |
B/h aspect ratio |
|
P |
|
0.122 |
16 |
31 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
5 |
49.6 |
0.25 |
15.3 |
45 |
0.4 |
Table 1 Hydraulic parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|