IAHR, founded in 1935, is a worldwide independent member-based organisation of engineers and water specialists working in fields related to the hydro-environmental sciences and their practical application. Activities range from river and maritime hydraulics to water resources development and eco-hydraulics, through to ice engineering, hydroinformatics, and hydraulic machinery.
Log On
About IAHRDirectoryCommitteesMy IAHRNews & JournalseLibraryeShopEventsJoin IAHRWorld CongressDonate
spacer.gif eLibrary
spacer.gif eLibrary
You are here : eLibrary : IAHR World Congress Proceedings : 36th Congress - The Hague (2015) ALL CONTENT : Sediment management and morphodynamics : Reduction of reservoir sedimentation by adopting sediment bypass tunnel
Reduction of reservoir sedimentation by adopting sediment bypass tunnel
High sediment-laden flow from watershed usually causes sedimentation problems in a reservoir. Most reservoirs in
Taiwan are lack of sediment sluicing facilities to release sediment during typhoon or heavy rainy seasons. Based on the
classification of sedimentation strategies, when the ratio of reservoir life to reservoir capacity is around 10, the
implement of a sediment bypass tunnel might be selected to reducing sedimentation. In Japan, the sediment bypass
tunnels at the Nunobiki dam and the Asahi dam were completed in 1908 and 1995, respectively. For designing these
bypass systems, hydraulic models of tunnel with a diversion weir had been constructed and conducted to investigate
sustainable reservoir management (Kashiwai et al., 1997, Lee et al., 2012). Several other successful examples of
bypassing systems are valuable for sediment reduction in a reservoir.
The Wushe reservoir located in central Taiwan has faced serious sediment problems due to huge sediment yield from
the watershed spatially after the 1999 disastrous Chi-Chi earthquake. According to the bathymetric survey in 2013, it
had lost 67% of its original capacity. Therefore, at the upstream river reach the Wushe reservoir is adopted to plan a
sediment bypass tunnel and serious deposition problems could be expected to decrease. The intake location was
selected be evaluated both construction cost and bypassing efficiency. The shorter distance of bypass line was decided
to minimum construction cost. The impacts of bypassing sediment on downstream river bed, sediment concentration,
the security of river embankment and aquatic environment are investigated if the bypass tunnel is completed. The
designed bypass discharge, 480m3/s, closed to the two-year return-period flood can result in 75% bypass efficiency.
However, there is still 25% of total inflow sediment volume with finer materials needed to be removed.
File Size : 1,616,984 bytes
File Type : Adobe Acrobat Document
Chapter : IAHR World Congress Proceedings
Category : 36th Congress - The Hague (2015) ALL CONTENT
Article : Sediment management and morphodynamics
Date Published : 19/08/2015
Download Now