IAHR, founded in 1935, is a worldwide independent member-based organisation of engineers and water specialists working in fields related to the hydro-environmental sciences and their practical application. Activities range from river and maritime hydraulics to water resources development and eco-hydraulics, through to ice engineering, hydroinformatics, and hydraulic machinery.
Log On
About IAHRDirectoryCommitteesMy IAHRNews & JournalseLibraryeShopEventsJoin IAHRWorld CongressDonate
spacer.gif
spacer.gif eLibrary
spacer.gif eLibrary
You are here : eLibrary : IAHR World Congress Proceedings : 36th Congress - The Hague (2015) ALL CONTENT : Water engineering : Model test of concrete overflow cofferdam with different crest shapes
Model test of concrete overflow cofferdam with different crest shapes
Author : CAO DESHENG (1), TIAN ZHONG (2) & ZHANG CHUNNI (3)
ABSTRACT
Cofferdam is a temporary protective structure, which always has been built before the major hydropower project for
preventing water into the foundation pit during construction. For a hydropower project with several years construction
period, the cofferdam is always required to discharge flood from the crest, so as to reduce the size of diversion
structures, reduce the construction duration and reduce the project investment. A concrete cofferdam with poorly
designed crest shape may result in downstream protection slope scouring and cofferdam downstream slope erosion.
Combined with a hydropower project, hydraulic model tests of a cofferdam with 6 different crest shapes were conducted
on a physical model with scale of 1:60. For each crest shape, velocity fields on the crest and the downstream protection
slope were measured, flow patterns near the cofferdam were detailed described, and the mean and fluctuating pressure
on the cofferdam downstream slope were measured and analyzed. The test results show that: (1) crest shape with a
smaller geometry size compared with cofferdam has a relatively little effect on the discharge capacity of cofferdam; (2)
the height of crest and its transition to cofferdam may influence flow patterns near the cofferdam and hydraulic
parameters (including velocity fields on the crest and the downstream protection slope, and the mean and fluctuating
pressure on the cofferdam downstream slope) more; (3) an appropriate depth in downstream foundation pit is very
beneficial for reducing the fluctuating pressure and downstream protection slope scouring. From comparative analysis,
shape II is regarded as a relative optimum one not only for the satisfactory discharge capacity of cofferdam, for a lesser
degree scouring on downstream protection slope, but also for its significantly decreasing velocity on the crest and the
downstream protection slope (in the case of flood overflowing crest) and for a lower fluctuating pressure resulted by
flood into downstream channel
File Size : 919,193 bytes
File Type : Adobe Acrobat Document
Chapter : IAHR World Congress Proceedings
Category : 36th Congress - The Hague (2015) ALL CONTENT
Article : Water engineering
Date Published : 28/08/2015
Download Now