IAHR, founded in 1935, is a worldwide independent member-based organisation of engineers and water specialists working in fields related to the hydro-environmental sciences and their practical application. Activities range from river and maritime hydraulics to water resources development and eco-hydraulics, through to ice engineering, hydroinformatics, and hydraulic machinery.
Log On
About IAHRDirectoryCommitteesMy IAHRNews & JournalseLibraryeShopEventsJoin IAHRWorld CongressDonate
spacer.gif
spacer.gif eLibrary
spacer.gif eLibrary
You are here : eLibrary : IAHR World Congress Proceedings : 35th IAHR Congress - Chengdu (2013) : THEME 4 - HYDRO-ENVIRONMENT : The Fundamental Differences between Subaqueous Gravity Flows and Open Channel Flows: Some Recent Adv...
The Fundamental Differences between Subaqueous Gravity Flows and Open Channel Flows: Some Recent Advances in the Research of Gravity Flows
Author : Heqing Huang
Research concerning open channel flows originated much earlier and is much mature than that for subaqueous gravity flows (SGF). Many important concepts and theory of open channel flows are often transplanted to SGF directly until several years ago. Recent theoretical, experimental and numerical advances on the research of gravity flows reveal that we may need to have more doubts about our traditional thinking by realizing the fundamental differences between the two. First, the critical densimetric Froude number for identifying sub- or super-critical flows may be larger or smaller than unit, or even non-existent in SGF on the reason that a supercritical SGF may dissipate its energy through the entrainment of ambient fluid or sedimentation. Secondly, a value of gradient Richardson number around 0.25 is generally deemed a critical value for stratification stability. Over the years it is found that at even gradient Richardson higher above unit, high horizontal eddy viscosity and eddy diffusivity are also observed even though vertical turbulence is inhibited by stratification. Thirdly, not long ago there is a heating argument about whether the secondary flow of SGF at sinuous channel bends is river-like, directed at the bed from the outer bank to the inner bank, or river-reversed between a American and an English research group based on their respective limited experimental observations. Then with more experiments and simulations, it is further realized that it may be river-like or river-reversed depending on bed slope or flow regimes. By simulating SGF in both straight and sinuous channels of various sinuosity, we find that small river-like circulation near the bottom corner of outer bank may co-exists with predominant river-reversed secondary flow. The secondary flow pattern of SGF is not only related to channel bed or flow regime but also to channel shape and sinuosity. These findings should have profound implications in our future study of SGF. We may not definitely expect sharp change in turbidites caused by hydraulic jumps when turbidity currents experience a slope change, we may not shut down turbulence in numerical models when the gradient Richardson number is above 0.25, and we need to realize that similar morphology may be formed due to different mechanisms between open channels and submarine channels.
File Size : 486,007 bytes
File Type : Adobe Acrobat Document
Chapter : IAHR World Congress Proceedings
Category : 35th IAHR Congress - Chengdu (2013)
Article : THEME 4 - HYDRO-ENVIRONMENT
Date Published : 18/07/2016
Download Now