DONATE

IAHR Document Library


« Back to Library Homepage « Proceedings of the 9th IAHR Meeting of the WorkGroup on Cavi...

Upstream Influence on the Francis Turbine Full-Load Surge Part I: Runner Blade Cavitation vs. Penstock Response

Author(s): Peter K Doerfler

Linked Author(s): Peter Doerfler

Keywords: Francis turbine; Full-load surge; Runner blade cavitation; Penstock response

Abstract: Full-load surge (FLS) can occur in some hydropower plants with Francis-type turbines or pump-turbines in case of high discharge. A vapor-filled cavity is formed in the center of the draft tube flow due to counter-rotating swirl downstream of the runner. FLS is an unstable interaction between the volume of this cavity and the pressure and discharge at the runner exit. Various theoretical models for such a feedback mechanism have been set up so far. Those models differ with regard to which flow variable is subject to the mass-flow gain. Müller (2014) added a new concept: based on observations on a reduced-scale model, he proposed that feedback from pressure-dependent cavitation at the runner outlet could cause instability. For the same case, Wack (2020) confirmed in a CFD study the destabilizing effect of runner blade cavitation assuming constant turbine inflow, without feedback from the penstock. A 1D model reproducing Wack’s simulation with regard to stability was also set up (Dörfler 2022). Two effects are missing in that setting: the discharge-driven variation of runner exit swirl and the dissipation of oscillation power across the runner. The present study is about a necessary extension of the 1D model. The boundary condition of constant runner discharge is replaced by a head-dependent discharge according to the turbine characteristics and penstock response, assuming an 8 m long intake pipe. With this modification, the pulsation of cavity volume due to the variable angular momentum flux released into the draft tube now consists of two components: pressure variation times cavitation gain factor Ψ, and discharge variation times mass flow gain factor χ. The extended model has the stability limit shifted to significantly lower cavitation number—closer to the experimental limit, but with approximately the same frequency. It results each one of the two effects—runner discharge variation as well as runner blade cavitation—can cause instability.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1483/1/012002

Year: 2023

Copyright © 2025 International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research. All rights reserved. | Terms and Conditions